OBJECTIVE: To assess coronary heart disease (CHD) risk within levels of the joint distribution of non-HDL and LDL cholesterol among individuals with and without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used four publicly available data sets for this pooled post hoc analysis and confined the eligible subjects to white individuals aged > or = 30 years and free of CHD at baseline (12,660 men and 6,721 women). Diabetes status was defined as either "reported by physician-diagnosed and on medication" or having a fasting glucose level > or = 126 mg/dl at the baseline examination. The primary end point was CHD death. Within diabetes categories, risk was assessed based on lipid levels (in mg/dl): non-HDL <130 and LDL <100 (group 1); non-HDL <130 and LDL > or = 100 (group 2); non-HDL > or = 130 and LDL <100 (group 3); and non-HDL > or = 130 and LDL > or = 100 (group 4). Group 1 within those without diabetes was the overall reference group. RESULTS: Of the subjects studied, approximately 6% of men and 4% of women were defined as having diabetes. A total of 773 CHD deaths occurred during the average 13 years of follow-up time. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of CHD death. Those with diabetes had a 200% higher RR than those without diabetes. In a multivariate model, CHD risk in those with diabetes did not increase with increasing LDL, whereas it did increase with increasing non-HDL: RR (95% confidence interval) for group 1: 5.7 (2.0-16.8); group 2: 5.7 (1.6-20.7); group 3: 7.2 (2.6-19.8); and group 4: 7.1 (3.7-13.6). CONCLUSIONS: Non-HDL is a stronger predictor of CHD death among those with diabetes than LDL and should be given more consideration in the clinical approach to risk reduction among diabetic patients.
OBJECTIVE: To assess coronary heart disease (CHD) risk within levels of the joint distribution of non-HDL and LDL cholesterol among individuals with and without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used four publicly available data sets for this pooled post hoc analysis and confined the eligible subjects to white individuals aged > or = 30 years and free of CHD at baseline (12,660 men and 6,721 women). Diabetes status was defined as either "reported by physician-diagnosed and on medication" or having a fasting glucose level > or = 126 mg/dl at the baseline examination. The primary end point was CHD death. Within diabetes categories, risk was assessed based on lipid levels (in mg/dl): non-HDL <130 and LDL <100 (group 1); non-HDL <130 and LDL > or = 100 (group 2); non-HDL > or = 130 and LDL <100 (group 3); and non-HDL > or = 130 and LDL > or = 100 (group 4). Group 1 within those without diabetes was the overall reference group. RESULTS: Of the subjects studied, approximately 6% of men and 4% of women were defined as having diabetes. A total of 773 CHD deaths occurred during the average 13 years of follow-up time. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of CHD death. Those with diabetes had a 200% higher RR than those without diabetes. In a multivariate model, CHD risk in those with diabetes did not increase with increasing LDL, whereas it did increase with increasing non-HDL: RR (95% confidence interval) for group 1: 5.7 (2.0-16.8); group 2: 5.7 (1.6-20.7); group 3: 7.2 (2.6-19.8); and group 4: 7.1 (3.7-13.6). CONCLUSIONS: Non-HDL is a stronger predictor of CHD death among those with diabetes than LDL and should be given more consideration in the clinical approach to risk reduction among diabeticpatients.
Authors: K Sarat Chandra; Manish Bansal; Tiny Nair; S S Iyengar; Rajeev Gupta; Subhash C Manchanda; P P Mohanan; V Dayasagar Rao; C N Manjunath; J P S Sawhney; Nakul Sinha; A K Pancholia; Sundeep Mishra; Ravi R Kasliwal; Saumitra Kumar; Unni Krishnan; Sanjay Kalra; Anoop Misra; Usha Shrivastava; Seema Gulati Journal: Indian Heart J Date: 2014-12-24
Authors: Bernhard M Kaess; Tonia de Las Heras Gala; Astrid Zierer; Christa Meisinger; Simone Wahl; Annette Peters; John Todd; Christian Herder; Cornelia Huth; Barbara Thorand; Wolfgang Koenig Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Brent M Egan; Jiexiang Li; Susan E Sutherland; Daniel W Jones; Keith C Ferdinand; Yuling Hong; Eduardo Sanchez Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Daniela C U Cavallini; Raquel Bedani; Laura Q Bomdespacho; Regina C Vendramini; Elizeu A Rossi Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2009-01-07 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Daniela C U Cavallini; Dulcinéia S P Abdalla; Regina C Vendramini; Raquel Bedani; Laura Q Bomdespacho; Nadiége D Pauly-Silveira; Graciela F de Valdez; Elizeu A Rossi Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 3.876