Literature DB >> 22354662

Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: the perspectives of parents of individuals with Down syndrome.

Angela Inglis1, Catriona Hippman, Jehannine C Austin.   

Abstract

This exploratory, descriptive study examined the views and opinions of parents of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) related to prenatal testing for DS and the use of age-based criteria to determine eligibility for this testing. This survey-based study was designed in collaboration with parents of individuals with DS and the British Columbia-based Lower Mainland Down Syndrome Society (LMDSS). The survey was a 26-item, self-report questionnaire, which was distributed by the LMDSS. Out of the 246 potentially eligible individuals that were mailed surveys, 101 participants returned their completed surveys. The availability of prenatal screening and diagnostic testing for DS was perceived positively by 55.1% and 64.7% of parents, respectively. More than half (60.2%) of participants felt that prenatal diagnostic testing for DS should be available to all pregnant women, regardless of age. In this study, views of Canadian parents of individuals with DS aligned with the prenatal testing policy recently adopted in the USA (whereby any woman, regardless of age or risk factors, can opt for prenatal diagnostic testing) rather than with new Canadian policy (whereby eligibility for diagnostic testing is no longer offered on the basis of age, but on the basis of other risk factors).
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22354662      PMCID: PMC3958964          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  12 in total

Review 1.  Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: a systematic literature review. European Concerted Action: DADA (Decision-making After the Diagnosis of a fetal Abnormality).

Authors:  C Mansfield; S Hopfer; T M Marteau
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Brian L Shaffer; Aaron B Caughey; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  David Chitayat; Sylvie Langlois; R Douglas Wilson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2011-07

Review 5.  First trimester prenatal diagnosis: amniocentesis.

Authors:  M F Delisle; R D Wilson
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  The attitude of women toward current and future possibilities of diagnostic testing in maternal blood using fetal DNA.

Authors:  Loes Kooij; Tjeerd Tymstra; Paul van den Berg
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Chromosomal abnormality rates at amniocentesis and in live-born infants.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross; D M Schreinemachers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-04-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Attitudes of mothers of children with Down syndrome concerning amniocentesis, abortion, and prenatal genetic counseling techniques.

Authors:  T E Elkins; T G Stovall; S Wilroy; J V Dacus
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Screening for fetal aneuploidy and neural tube defects.

Authors:  Deborah A Driscoll; Susan J Gross
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  RETIRED: Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Anne M Summers; Sylvie Langlois; Phil Wyatt; R Douglas Wilson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2007-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Attitudes of mothers of children with down syndrome towards noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Gregory Kellogg; Leah Slattery; Louanne Hudgins; Kelly Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A 'cure' for Down syndrome: what do parents want?

Authors:  A Inglis; Z Lohn; J C Austin; C Hippman
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Prenatal Genetic Screening and Potential Complicity in Abortion: Considerations for Catholic Health Care.

Authors:  Carolyn A Laabs
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-11-07

4.  What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?

Authors:  Rachèl V van Schendel; Adriana Kater-Kuipers; Elsbeth H van Vliet-Lachotzki; Wybo J Dondorp; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Rodent models in Down syndrome research: impact and future opportunities.

Authors:  Yann Herault; Jean M Delabar; Elizabeth M C Fisher; Victor L J Tybulewicz; Eugene Yu; Veronique Brault
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.758

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.