Literature DB >> 30945141

Lexical processing depends on sublexical processing: Evidence from the visual world paradigm and aphasia.

Heather R Dial1, Bob McMurray2, Randi C Martin3.   

Abstract

Some early studies of people with aphasia reported strikingly better performance on lexical than on sublexical speech perception tasks. These findings challenged the claim that lexical processing depends on sublexical processing and suggested that acoustic information could be mapped directly to lexical representations. However, Dial and Martin (Neuropsychologia 96: 192-212, 2017) argued that these studies failed to match the discriminability of targets and distractors for the sublexical and lexical stimuli and showed that when using closely matched tasks with natural speech tokens, no patient performed substantially better at the lexical than at the sublexical processing task. In the current study, we sought to provide converging evidence for the dependence of lexical on sublexical processing by examining the perception of synthetic speech stimuli varied on a voice-onset time continuum using eye-tracking methodology, which is sensitive to online speech perception processes. Eight individuals with aphasia and ten age-matched controls completed two visual world paradigm tasks: phoneme (sublexical) and word (lexical) identification. For both identification and eye-movement data, strong correlations were observed between the sublexical and lexical tasks. Critically, no patient within the control range on the lexical task was impaired on the sublexical task. Overall, the current study supports the claim that lexical processing depends on sublexical processing. Implications for inferring deficits in people with aphasia and the use of sublexical tasks to assess sublexical processing are also discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive; Eye movements; Perceptual categorization and identification; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30945141      PMCID: PMC6615952          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01718-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  33 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN.

Authors:  P A Luce; S D Goldinger; E T Auer; M S Vitevitch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

4.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.

Authors:  Kenneth N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-12

Review 6.  Speech perception.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Delphine Dahan; James M McQueen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-11

8.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

Review 9.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

10.  The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults.

Authors:  Dayna S Dalton; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Terry L Wiley; David M Nondahl
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2003-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Sublexical cues affect degraded speech processing: insights from fMRI.

Authors:  Arkan Al-Zubaidi; Susann Bräuer; Chris R Holdgraf; Inga M Schepers; Jochem W Rieger
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-02-16

2.  Autism-spectrum traits in neurotypicals predict the embodiment of manipulation knowledge about object concepts: Evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Charles P Davis; Inge-Marie Eigsti; Roisin Healy; Gitte H Joergensen; Eiling Yee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.