Literature DB >> 22347532

Effectiveness of outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy replacement using esophagogastroduodenoscopy and propofol sedation.

Akira Horiuchi1, Yoshiko Nakayama, Masashi Kajiyama, Naoki Tanaka.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) replacement using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and propofol sedation.
METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the outcome and complications of consecutive patients referred for PEG replacement which was performed using EGD under propofol sedation in the outpatient setting. The success rate, the mean dose of propofol, procedure time, EGD findings, discharge time from endoscopy unit, respiratory depression, and complications within 72 h of the procedure were evaluated. In a subset of these patients, the blood concentrations of propofol were measured.
RESULTS: All 221 patients underwent successful PEG replacement. The mean dose of propofol was 34 mg (range, 20-60 mg) with a mean procedure time of 5.9 min (range, 3-8 min). Reflux esophagitis (12 patients), gastric ulcer (5), gastric neoplasm (2), and duodenal ulcer (1) were newly diagnosed at replacement. Discharge from endoscopy unit was possible in 100% of patients 45 min after the procedure. Only 3.6% (8) required transient supplemental oxygen. No complications occurred within 72 h of the procedure. During EGD the level of sedation and propofol blood concentrations after administration of propofol (30 mg) in these PEG patients corresponded to those of propofol (60 mg) in middle aged subjects (control).
CONCLUSION: PEG replacement using EGD and propofol sedationin the outpatient setting was safe and practical.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; Gastrostomy; PEG; Propofol

Year:  2012        PMID: 22347532      PMCID: PMC3280355          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i2.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  21 in total

Review 1.  Complications of enteral access.

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; Wei-Kuo Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  The sky blue method as a screening test to detect misplacement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube at exchange.

Authors:  Yutaka Suzuki; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Hideki Yoshida; Tsuyoshi Iwase; Toshiroh Kura; Shin Imazato; Michiaki Kudo; Tomoyuki Ohta; Akihiro Mizuhara; Yutaka Tamamori; Hirohito Muramatsu; Yukio Nishiguchi; Yorihiro Nishiyama; Mikako Takahashi; Shinji Nishiwaki; Masami Matsumoto; Satoshi Goshi; Shigeo Sakamoto; Nobuyuki Uchida; Masashi Ijima; Tetsushi Ogawa; Makoto Shimazaki; Shinichi Takei; Chikou Kimura; Satoyoshi Yamashita; Takao Endo; Masato Nakahori; Akihiko Itoh; Toshiro Kusakabe; Izumi Ishizuka; Takao Iiri; Shingo Fukasawa; Yukitsugu Arimoto; Nobuaki Kajitani; Kazuhiko Ishida; Koji Onishi; Akihiko Taira; Makoto Kobayashi; Yasuto Itano; Toshiya Kobuke
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.271

3.  Efficacy and safety of therapeutic ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsinelos; George Paroutoglou; Jannis Kountouras; Christos Zavos; Athanasios Beltsis; George Tzovaras
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  A rapid and simple HPLC method for the analysis of propofol in biological fluids.

Authors:  Xavier Cussonneau; Els De Smet; Kristof Lantsoght; Jean-Paul Salvi; Magali Bolon-Larger; Roselyne Boulieu
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.935

5.  A prospective safety study of a low-dose propofol sedation protocol for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Brian W Sipe; Mark Scheidler; Arthur Baluyut; Betty Wright
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: results in 10,662 adults.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Nao Hidaka; Yasuyuki Ichise; Masashi Kajiyama; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  John J Vargo; Gregory Zuccaro; John A Dumot; Kenneth M Shermock; J Brad Morrow; Darwin L Conwell; Patricia A Trolli; Walter G Maurer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures in patients 90 years of age and older.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Naoki Tanaka; Yasuyuki Ichise; Yoshihiko Katsuyama; Shigeru Ohmori
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Conscious sedation with propofol in elderly patients: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  L T Heuss; P Schnieper; J Drewe; E Pflimlin; C Beglinger
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Safety of propofol for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients-a prospective, controlled study.

Authors:  Ludwig T Heuss; Patrizia Schnieper; Juergen Drewe; Eric Pflimlin; Christoph Beglinger
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  1 in total

1.  Safety and effectiveness of propofol sedation during and after outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Masashi Kajiyama; Naoyuki Kato; Tetsuya Kamijima; Yasuyuki Ichise; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.