Literature DB >> 19513021

Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: results in 10,662 adults.

Akira Horiuchi1, Yoshiko Nakayama, Nao Hidaka, Yasuyuki Ichise, Masashi Kajiyama, Naoki Tanaka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures has increased in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of nurse-administered low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).
METHODS: We prospectively assessed the outcome and complications of low-dose bolus propofol for endoscopic sedation for diagnostic EGD. Propofol was administered by bolus injection, with a standard protocol of 40 mg for patients <70 years old, 30 mg for patients 70-89 years old, and 20 mg for patients 90 years or older. When required for adequate sedation, additional doses were given, to a maximum of 120 mg. The primary outcome measure was respiratory depression, defined as oxygen desaturation (SpO(2) <90%) that continued for more than 20 s. Secondary measures included successful procedures, full recovery within 60 min of the procedure, and complications.
RESULTS: All procedures were successful; 8,431 of 10,662 patients (79.1%) completed diagnostic EGD with a single bolus of propofol. Only 0.26% (28 patients) required transient supplemental oxygen supply; neither mask ventilation nor endotracheal intubation was required. Full recovery occurred in 99.9% of patients 60 min after the procedure. Men and younger patients required significantly higher doses of propofol than did the women and older patients (men vs. women, 46.5+/-19 vs. 42.7+/-15 mg, P=0.0008; age 40-49 vs. age 50-59, 51.5+/-16 vs. 46.3+/-13 mg, P<0.0001). Of the 400 patients, 368 (92%) wanted to drive home or to their offices, and all did so without incident. A total of 99% were willing to repeat the same procedure again.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose nurse-administered propofol sedation is safe and practical for diagnostic EGD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19513021     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  26 in total

1.  Analysis of oxygen saturations recorded during dental intravenous sedations: a retrospective quality assurance of 3500 cases.

Authors:  Andre Viljoen; Karen Byth; Malcolm Coombs; Greg Mahoney; Douglas Stewart
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2011

2.  Significant and safe shortening of the recovery time after flumazenil-reversed midazolam sedation.

Authors:  Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen; Linda de Jong; Hedwig A Kos-Foekema
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Safety and effectiveness of propofol sedation during and after outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Masashi Kajiyama; Naoyuki Kato; Tetsuya Kamijima; Yasuyuki Ichise; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Benefits and limitations of cap-fitted colonoscopy in screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Masashi Kajiyama; Naoyuki Kato; Yasuyuki Ichise; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Effectiveness of outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy replacement using esophagogastroduodenoscopy and propofol sedation.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Masashi Kajiyama; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-02-16

Review 6.  Propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Toshihiro Nishizawa; Hidekazu Suzuki
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Stepwise sedation for elderly patients with mild/moderate COPD during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Can-Xia Xu; Xiong Chen; Yan Jia; Ding-Hua Xiao; Hui-Fang Zou; Qin Guo; Fen Wang; Xiao-Yan Wang; Shou-Rong Shen; Ling-Ling Tong; Ke Cao; Xiao-Ming Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues.

Authors:  John K Triantafillidis; Emmanuel Merikas; Dimitrios Nikolakis; Apostolos E Papalois
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Sedation methods can determine performance of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasia.

Authors:  Chan Hyuk Park; Jae Hoon Min; Young-Chul Yoo; Hyunzu Kim; Dong Hoo Joh; Jung Hyun Jo; Suji Shin; Hyuk Lee; Jun Chul Park; Sung Kwan Shin; Yong Chan Lee; Sang Kil Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Risk of sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy in obstructive sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Jung Won Jeun; Kwan Mi Pack; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Hyun Phil Shin; Won-Chul Shin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.