Literature DB >> 32513662

Dynamic Time-Locking Mechanism in the Cortical Representation of Spoken Words.

A Nora1, A Faisal2, J Seol2, H Renvall2, E Formisano3,4, R Salmelin2.   

Abstract

Human speech has a unique capacity to carry and communicate rich meanings. However, it is not known how the highly dynamic and variable perceptual signal is mapped to existing linguistic and semantic representations. In this novel approach, we used the natural acoustic variability of sounds and mapped them to magnetoencephalography (MEG) data using physiologically-inspired machine-learning models. We aimed at determining how well the models, differing in their representation of temporal information, serve to decode and reconstruct spoken words from MEG recordings in 16 healthy volunteers. We discovered that dynamic time-locking of the cortical activation to the unfolding speech input is crucial for the encoding of the acoustic-phonetic features of speech. In contrast, time-locking was not highlighted in cortical processing of non-speech environmental sounds that conveyed the same meanings as the spoken words, including human-made sounds with temporal modulation content similar to speech. The amplitude envelope of the spoken words was particularly well reconstructed based on cortical evoked responses. Our results indicate that speech is encoded cortically with especially high temporal fidelity. This speech tracking by evoked responses may partly reflect the same underlying neural mechanism as the frequently reported entrainment of the cortical oscillations to the amplitude envelope of speech. Furthermore, the phoneme content was reflected in cortical evoked responses simultaneously with the spectrotemporal features, pointing to an instantaneous transformation of the unfolding acoustic features into linguistic representations during speech processing.
Copyright © 2020 Nora et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory system; magnetoencephalography; neural decoding; speech processing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32513662      PMCID: PMC7470935          DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0475-19.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  eNeuro        ISSN: 2373-2822


  64 in total

1.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to natural and altered species-specific calls.

Authors:  D D Gehr; H Komiya; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The organization of words and environmental sounds in memory.

Authors:  Kristi Hendrickson; Matthew Walenski; Margaret Friend; Tracy Love
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing.

Authors:  Keith B Doelling; Luc H Arnal; Oded Ghitza; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  "Who" is saying "what"? Brain-based decoding of human voice and speech.

Authors:  Elia Formisano; Federico De Martino; Milene Bonte; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements.

Authors:  S Taulu; J Simola
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Conceptual priming for realistic auditory scenes and for auditory words.

Authors:  Aline Frey; Mitsuko Aramaki; Mireille Besson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Simple Acoustic Features Can Explain Phoneme-Based Predictions of Cortical Responses to Speech.

Authors:  Christoph Daube; Robin A A Ince; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Lucia Melloni; Hang Zhang; Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  1 in total

1.  Selective auditory attention within naturalistic scenes modulates reactivity to speech sounds.

Authors:  Hanna Renvall; Jaeho Seol; Riku Tuominen; Bettina Sorger; Lars Riecke; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.698

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.