BACKGROUND: The nature and contribution of different pregnancy-related complications to future cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its risk factors and the mechanisms underlying these associations remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied associations of pregnancy diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, and size for gestational age with calculated 10-year CVD risk (based on the Framingham score) and a wide range of cardiovascular risk factors measured 18 years after pregnancy (mean age at outcome assessment, 48 years) in a prospective cohort of 3416 women. Gestational diabetes mellitus was positively associated with fasting glucose and insulin, even after adjustment for potential confounders, whereas hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were associated with body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, lipids, and insulin. Large for gestational age was associated with greater waist circumference and glucose concentrations, whereas small for gestational age and preterm delivery were associated with higher blood pressure. The association with the calculated 10-year CVD risk based on the Framingham prediction score was odds ratio 1.31 (95 confidence interval, 1.11-1.53) for preeclampsia and 1.26 (95 confidence interval, 0.95-1.68) for gestational diabetes mellitus compared with women without preeclampsia and without gestational diabetes mellitus, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and pregnancy diabetes mellitus are independently associated with an increased calculated 10-year CVD risk. Preeclampsia may be the better predictor of future CVD because it was associated with a wider range of cardiovascular risk factors. Our results suggest that pregnancy may be an important opportunity for early identification of women at increased risk of CVD later in life.
BACKGROUND: The nature and contribution of different pregnancy-related complications to future cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its risk factors and the mechanisms underlying these associations remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied associations of pregnancy diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, and size for gestational age with calculated 10-year CVD risk (based on the Framingham score) and a wide range of cardiovascular risk factors measured 18 years after pregnancy (mean age at outcome assessment, 48 years) in a prospective cohort of 3416 women. Gestational diabetes mellitus was positively associated with fasting glucose and insulin, even after adjustment for potential confounders, whereas hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were associated with body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, lipids, and insulin. Large for gestational age was associated with greater waist circumference and glucose concentrations, whereas small for gestational age and preterm delivery were associated with higher blood pressure. The association with the calculated 10-year CVD risk based on the Framingham prediction score was odds ratio 1.31 (95 confidence interval, 1.11-1.53) for preeclampsia and 1.26 (95 confidence interval, 0.95-1.68) for gestational diabetes mellitus compared with women without preeclampsia and without gestational diabetes mellitus, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and pregnancy diabetes mellitus are independently associated with an increased calculated 10-year CVD risk. Preeclampsia may be the better predictor of future CVD because it was associated with a wider range of cardiovascular risk factors. Our results suggest that pregnancy may be an important opportunity for early identification of women at increased risk of CVD later in life.
Authors: Erica P Gunderson; David R Jacobs; Vicky Chiang; Cora E Lewis; Ailin Tsai; Charles P Quesenberry; Stephen Sidney Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-06-26 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: N Sarwar; P Gao; S R Kondapally Seshasai; R Gobin; S Kaptoge; E Di Angelantonio; E Ingelsson; D A Lawlor; E Selvin; M Stampfer; C D A Stehouwer; S Lewington; L Pennells; A Thompson; N Sattar; I R White; K K Ray; J Danesh Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-06-26 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Catherine J Vladutiu; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Alison M Stuebe; Andy Ni; Karen M Tabb; Linda C Gallo; JoNell E Potter; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-02
Authors: Alice M Jackson; Ruiqi Zhang; Iain Findlay; Keith Robertson; Mitchell Lindsay; Tamsin Morris; Brian Forbes; Richard Papworth; Alex McConnachie; Kenneth Mangion; Pardeep S Jhund; Colin McCowan; Colin Berry Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2020-04-01
Authors: Jennifer J Stuart; Lauren J Tanz; Nancy R Cook; Donna Spiegelman; Stacey A Missmer; Eric B Rimm; Kathryn M Rexrode; Kenneth J Mukamal; Janet W Rich-Edwards Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Egle Bytautiene; Nataliya Bulayeva; Geeta Bhat; Li Li; Kevin P Rosenblatt; George R Saade Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 8.661