Alice M Jackson1, Ruiqi Zhang2, Iain Findlay3, Keith Robertson3,4, Mitchell Lindsay4,5, Tamsin Morris6, Brian Forbes6, Richard Papworth2, Alex McConnachie2, Kenneth Mangion1, Pardeep S Jhund1, Colin McCowan7, Colin Berry1,4,5. 1. British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK. 2. Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Boyd Orr Building, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. 3. Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Corsebar Road, Paisley PA2 9PN, UK. 4. Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Agamemnon Street, Clydebank G81 4DY, UK. 5. Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK. 6. AstraZeneca UK, Capability Green, Luton LU1 3LU, UK. 7. School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences Building, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9TF, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: Ischaemic heart disease persists as the leading cause of death in both men and women in most countries and sex disparities, defined as differences in health outcomes and their determinants, may be relevant. We examined sex disparities in presenting characteristics, treatment and all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction (MI) or angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a cohort study of all patients admitted with MI or angina (01 October 2013 to 30 June 2016) from a secondary care acute coronary syndrome e-Registry in NHS Scotland linked with national registers of community drug dispensation and mortality data. A total of 7878 patients hospitalized for MI or angina were prospectively included; 3161 (40%) were women. Women were older, more deprived, had a greater burden of comorbidity, were more often treated with guideline-recommended therapy preadmission and less frequently received immediate invasive management. Men were more likely to receive coronary angiography [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.52, confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.68] and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR 1.68, CI 1.52-1.86). Women were less comprehensively treated with evidence-based therapies post-MI. Women had worse crude survival, primarily those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (14.3% vs. 8.0% at 1 year, P < 0.001), but this finding was explained by differences in baseline factors. Men with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction had a higher risk of all-cause death at 30 days [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.72, CI 1.16-2.56] and 1 year (adjusted HR 1.38, CI 1.12-1.69). CONCLUSION: After taking account of baseline risk factors, sex differences in treatment pathway, use of invasive management, and secondary prevention therapies indicate disparities in guideline-directed management of women hospitalized with MI or angina. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Ischaemic heart disease persists as the leading cause of death in both men and women in most countries and sex disparities, defined as differences in health outcomes and their determinants, may be relevant. We examined sex disparities in presenting characteristics, treatment and all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction (MI) or angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a cohort study of all patients admitted with MI or angina (01 October 2013 to 30 June 2016) from a secondary care acute coronary syndrome e-Registry in NHS Scotland linked with national registers of community drug dispensation and mortality data. A total of 7878 patients hospitalized for MI or angina were prospectively included; 3161 (40%) were women. Women were older, more deprived, had a greater burden of comorbidity, were more often treated with guideline-recommended therapy preadmission and less frequently received immediate invasive management. Men were more likely to receive coronary angiography [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.52, confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.68] and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR 1.68, CI 1.52-1.86). Women were less comprehensively treated with evidence-based therapies post-MI. Women had worse crude survival, primarily those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (14.3% vs. 8.0% at 1 year, P < 0.001), but this finding was explained by differences in baseline factors. Men with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction had a higher risk of all-cause death at 30 days [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.72, CI 1.16-2.56] and 1 year (adjusted HR 1.38, CI 1.12-1.69). CONCLUSION: After taking account of baseline risk factors, sex differences in treatment pathway, use of invasive management, and secondary prevention therapies indicate disparities in guideline-directed management of women hospitalized with MI or angina. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Sonia S Anand; Chang Chun Xie; Shamir Mehta; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Campbell Joyner; Susan Chrolavicius; Keith A A Fox; Salim Yusuf Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-10-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert W Yeh; Stephen Sidney; Malini Chandra; Michael Sorel; Joseph V Selby; Alan S Go Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alice K Jacobs; Janet M Johnston; Amelia Haviland; Maria Mori Brooks; Sheryl F Kelsey; David R Holmes; David P Faxon; David O Williams; Katherine M Detre Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: K P Champney; P D Frederick; H Bueno; S Parashar; J Foody; C N B Merz; J G Canto; J H Lichtman; V Vaccarino Journal: Heart Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Anoop S V Shah; Megan Griffiths; Kuan Ken Lee; David A McAllister; Amanda L Hunter; Amy V Ferry; Anne Cruikshank; Alan Reid; Mary Stoddart; Fiona Strachan; Simon Walker; Paul O Collinson; Fred S Apple; Alasdair J Gray; Keith A A Fox; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-01-21
Authors: Chris Wilkinson; Owen Bebb; Tatendashe B Dondo; Theresa Munyombwe; Barbara Casadei; Sarah Clarke; François Schiele; Adam Timmis; Marlous Hall; Chris P Gale Journal: Heart Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Connie N Hess; Lisa A McCoy; Hesha J Duggirala; Dale R Tavris; Kathryn O'Callaghan; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson; Tracy Y Wang Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Brian A Bergmark; Njambi Mathenge; Piera A Merlini; Marilyn B Lawrence-Wright; Robert P Giugliano Journal: Lancet Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 79.321