Catherine J Vladutiu1, Anna Maria Siega-Riz2, Daniela Sotres-Alvarez2, Alison M Stuebe2, Andy Ni2, Karen M Tabb2, Linda C Gallo2, JoNell E Potter2, Gerardo Heiss2. 1. From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, (C.J.V., A.M.S.), Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health (C.J.V., A.M.S.-R., G.H.), Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health (A.M.S.-R.), Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health (D.S.-A., A.N.), Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health (A.M.S.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (K.M.T.); Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, CA (L.C.G.); and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL (J.E.P.). catherine_vladutiu@med.unc.edu. 2. From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, (C.J.V., A.M.S.), Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health (C.J.V., A.M.S.-R., G.H.), Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health (A.M.S.-R.), Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health (D.S.-A., A.N.), Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health (A.M.S.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (K.M.T.); Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, CA (L.C.G.); and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL (J.E.P.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physiological adaptations occurring across successive pregnancies may increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular health outcomes in later life. METHODS AND RESULTS: The association between parity and metabolic syndrome was examined among 7467 Hispanic/Latina women of diverse backgrounds, aged 18 to 74 years, who participated in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) from 2008 to 2011. Metabolic syndrome components were defined according to American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria and included abdominal obesity, elevated triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high blood pressure, and elevated fasting glucose. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) adjusting for sociodemographic, behavioral, and reproductive characteristics. At HCHS/SOL baseline, women reported none (21.1%), 1 (19.9%), 2 (25.7%), 3 (18.6%), 4 (8.8%), and ≥ 5 (5.9%) live births. When compared with women with 1 birth, those with 4 births had the highest odds of abdominal obesity (OR, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.8) and overall metabolic syndrome (OR, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.0) and those with ≥ 5 births had the highest odds of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.0) and elevated fasting glucose (OR, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.4), after adjusting for age, background, education, marital status, income, nativity, smoking, physical activity, menopause, oral contraceptive use, hormone therapy, and field center. Further adjustment for percent body fat attenuated these associations. No associations were observed between parity and elevated triglycerides or high blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Higher parity is associated with an increased prevalence of selected components of the metabolic syndrome among Hispanic/Latina women in the US. High parity among Hispanics/Latinas with a high prevalence of abdominal obesity suggests high risk for metabolic dysregulation.
BACKGROUND: Physiological adaptations occurring across successive pregnancies may increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular health outcomes in later life. METHODS AND RESULTS: The association between parity and metabolic syndrome was examined among 7467 Hispanic/Latina women of diverse backgrounds, aged 18 to 74 years, who participated in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) from 2008 to 2011. Metabolic syndrome components were defined according to American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria and included abdominal obesity, elevated triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high blood pressure, and elevated fasting glucose. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) adjusting for sociodemographic, behavioral, and reproductive characteristics. At HCHS/SOL baseline, women reported none (21.1%), 1 (19.9%), 2 (25.7%), 3 (18.6%), 4 (8.8%), and ≥ 5 (5.9%) live births. When compared with women with 1 birth, those with 4 births had the highest odds of abdominal obesity (OR, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.8) and overall metabolic syndrome (OR, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.0) and those with ≥ 5 births had the highest odds of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.0) and elevated fasting glucose (OR, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.4), after adjusting for age, background, education, marital status, income, nativity, smoking, physical activity, menopause, oral contraceptive use, hormone therapy, and field center. Further adjustment for percent body fat attenuated these associations. No associations were observed between parity and elevated triglycerides or high blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Higher parity is associated with an increased prevalence of selected components of the metabolic syndrome among Hispanic/Latina women in the US. High parity among Hispanics/Latinas with a high prevalence of abdominal obesity suggests high risk for metabolic dysregulation.
Authors: Paul D Sorlie; Larissa M Avilés-Santa; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Robert C Kaplan; Martha L Daviglus; Aida L Giachello; Neil Schneiderman; Leopoldo Raij; Gregory Talavera; Matthew Allison; Lisa Lavange; Lloyd E Chambless; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Anna C O'Kelly; Erin D Michos; Chrisandra L Shufelt; Jane V Vermunt; Margo B Minissian; Odayme Quesada; Graeme N Smith; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Vesna D Garovic; Samar R El Khoudary; Michael C Honigberg Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Marisa J Perera; Samantha A Reina; Tali Elfassy; JoNell E Potter; Daniela Sotres Alvarez; Melissa A Simon; Carmen R Isasi; Alison M Stuebe; Neil Schneiderman; Maria M Llabre Journal: Women Health Date: 2018-08-09
Authors: Nicole T A Rosendaal; Beatriz Alvarado; Yan Yan Wu; Maria P Velez; Saionara M Aires da Câmara; Catherine M Pirkle Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Bas Van Rijn; Titia Lely; Gerbrand Albertus Zoet; Nina D Paauw; Katrien Groenhof; Arie Franx; Ron T Gansevoort; Henk Groen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-05-05 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Diana C Soria-Contreras; Belem Trejo-Valdivia; Alejandra Cantoral; María Luisa Pizano-Zárate; Andrea A Baccarelli; Allan C Just; Elena Colicino; Andrea L Deierlein; Robert O Wright; Emily Oken; Martha María Téllez-Rojo; Ruy López-Ridaura Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Ana Cristina Lindsay; Mary L Greaney; Sherrie F Wallington; Julie A Wright; Anne T Hunt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shivani R Aggarwal; David M Herrington; Catherine J Vladutiu; Jill C Newman; Katrina Swett; Franklyn Gonzalez; Jorge R Kizer; Michelle A Kominiarek; Karen M Tabb; Linda C Gallo; Gregory A Talavera; Barry E Hurwitz; Carlos J Rodriguez Journal: Open Heart Date: 2017-05-08