Literature DB >> 22342859

Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening.

Nathan R Treff1, Xin Tao, Kathleen M Ferry, Jing Su, Deanne Taylor, Richard T Scott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based method for blastocyst trophectoderm comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) of aneuploidy.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and blinded.
SETTING: Academic center for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): Nine cell lines were obtained from a commercial cell line repository, and 71 discarded human blastocysts were obtained from 24 IVF patients that underwent preimplantation genetic screening. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Consistency of qPCR diagnosis of aneuploidy compared with either conventional karyotyping of cell lines or microarray-based diagnoses of human blastocysts. RESULT(S): Samples from nine cell lines with well characterized karyotypes were diagnosed by qPCR with 97.6% (41/42) consistency. After applying a minimum threshold for concurrence, 100% consistency was achieved. Developmentally normal blastocysts designated as aneuploid or arrested blastocysts designated as euploid by single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray analyses were assigned identical 24 chromosome diagnoses by qPCR in 98.6% of cases (70/71). Overall euploidy (n = 37) and aneuploidy (n = 34) were assigned with 100% consistency. Data was obtained for both sample types in 4 hours. CONCLUSION(S): These data demonstrate the first qPCR technology capable of accurate aneuploidy screening of all 24 chromosomes in 4 hours. This methodology provides an opportunity to evaluate trophectoderm biopsies with subsequent fresh euploid blastocyst transfer. Randomized controlled trials to investigate the clinical efficacy of qPCR-based CCS are currently underway.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22342859     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  61 in total

1.  A greater number of euploid blastocysts in a given cohort predicts excellent outcomes in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Scott Morin; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David McCulloh; Jamie Grifo; Santiago Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Next-generation molecular diagnosis: single-cell sequencing from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Wanjun Zhu; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Sadie L Marjani; Jialing Zhang; Wengeng Zhang; Shixiu Wu; Xinghua Pan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  An integrated investigation of oocyte developmental competence: expression of key genes in human cumulus cells, morphokinetics of early divisions, blastulation, and euploidy.

Authors:  C Scarica; D Cimadomo; L Dovere; A Giancani; M Stoppa; A Capalbo; F M Ubaldi; L Rienzi; R Canipari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Improved sensitivity to detect recombination using qPCR for Dyskeratosis Congenita PGD.

Authors:  Ndeye-Aicha Gueye; Chaim Jalas; Xin Tao; Deanne Taylor; Richard T Scott; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Trophectoderm DNA fingerprinting by quantitative real-time PCR successfully distinguishes sibling human embryos.

Authors:  Richard T Scott; Jing Su; Xin Tao; Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Deanne Taylor; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Valeria Romanelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Girardi; Marta Stoppa; Lisa Dovere; Domenico Dell'Edera; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic screening 2.0: the theory.

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; Karen Sermon
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 8.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  A review of, and commentary on, the ongoing second clinical introduction of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to routine IVF practice.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.