Literature DB >> 23473898

Prospective systematic intervention to reduce patient exposure to radiation during pediatric ureteroscopy.

Paul J Kokorowski1, Jeanne S Chow, Keith J Strauss, Melanie Pennison, William Tan, Bartley Cilento, Caleb P Nelson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: After prospective measurement of radiation exposure during pediatric ureteroscopy for urolithiasis, we identified targets for intervention. We sought to systematically reduce radiation exposure during pediatric ureteroscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed and implemented a pre-fluoroscopy quality checklist for patients undergoing ureteroscopy at our institution as part of a quality improvement initiative. Preoperative patient characteristics, operative factors, fluoroscopy settings and radiation exposure were recorded. Primary outcomes were the entrance skin dose in mGy and midline dose in mGy before and after checklist implementation.
RESULTS: We directly observed 32 consecutive ureteroscopy procedures using the safety checklist, of which 27 were done in pediatric patients who met study inclusion criteria. Outcomes were compared to those in 37 patients from the pre-checklist phase. Pre-checklist and postchecklist groups were similar in patient age, total operative time or patient thickness. The mean entrance skin dose and midline dose were decreased by 88% and 87%, respectively (p <0.01). Significant improvements were noted among the major radiation dose determinants, total fluoroscopy time (reduced by 67%), dose rate setting (appropriately reduced dose setting in 93% vs 51%) and excess skin-to-intensifier distance (reduced by 78%, each p <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: After systematic evaluation of our practices and implementation of a fluoroscopy quality checklist, there were dramatic decreases in radiation doses to children during ureteroscopy.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALARA; AP; DAP; ESD; MLD; SSD; URS; anterior to posterior; as low as reasonably achievable; checklist; dose area product; entrance skin dose; kidney; midline absorbed dose; nephrolithiasis; radiation dosage; source-to-skin distance; ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23473898      PMCID: PMC4303465          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

1.  The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality?

Authors:  Thomas L Slovis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients--a white paper executive summary.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Reduction of radiation during fluoroscopic urodynamics: analysis of quality assurance protocol limiting fluoroscopic images during fluoroscopic urodynamic studies.

Authors:  Courtney L Lee; Kevin Wunderle; Sandip P Vasavada; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Physician documentation of fluoroscopy time in voiding cystourethrography reports correlates with lower fluoroscopy times: a surrogate marker of patient radiation exposure.

Authors:  Stephen Darling; Marla Sammer; Teresa Chapman; Marguerite T Parisi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Hawthorne effect: shortening of fluoroscopy times during radiation measurement studies.

Authors:  T Vehmas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Prospective measurement of patient exposure to radiation during pediatric ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Paul J Kokorowski; Jeanne S Chow; Keith Strauss; Melanie Pennison; Jonathan C Routh; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Exposure to patient during interventional endourological procedures.

Authors:  J Hristova-Popova; I Saltirov; J Vassileva
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing.

Authors:  John E Ziewacz; Alexander F Arriaga; Angela M Bader; William R Berry; Lizabeth Edmondson; Judith M Wong; Stuart R Lipsitz; David L Hepner; Sarah Peyre; Steven Nelson; Daniel J Boorman; Douglas S Smink; Stanley W Ashley; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Harry Cullings; Akihiko Suyama; Sachiyo Funamoto; Nobuo Nishi; Midori Soda; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Kazunori Kodama; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Roy E Shore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Approaches to Eliminate Radiation Exposure in the Management of Pediatric Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Ravindra Sahadev; Victoria Maxon; Arun Srinivasan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Radiation-free flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone treatment.

Authors:  Braulio O Manzo; Edgard Lozada; Gildardo Manzo; Héctor M Sánchez; Francisco Gomez; Alejandro Figueroa; Adrian Gonzalez
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 3.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Takaaki Inoue; Shinsuke Okada; Shuzo Hamamoto; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

Review 4.  ALARA in Urology: Steps to Minimise Radiation Exposure During All Parts of the Endourological Journey.

Authors:  Radhika Bhanot; Zeeshan B M Hameed; Milap Shah; Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Andreas Skolarikos; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 5.  How should radiation exposure be handled in fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures in the field of gastroenterology?

Authors:  Mamoru Takenaka; Makoto Hosono; Shiro Hayashi; Tsutomu Nishida; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.