PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI method called DIfferential Sub-sampling with Cartesian Ordering (DISCO) for abdominal imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional, variable density pseudo-random k-space segmentation scheme was developed and combined with a Dixon-based fat-water separation algorithm to generate high temporal resolution images with robust fat suppression and without compromise in spatial resolution or coverage. With institutional review board approval and informed consent, 11 consecutive patients referred for abdominal MRI at 3 Tesla (T) were imaged with both DISCO and a routine clinical three-dimensional SPGR-Dixon (LAVA FLEX) sequence. All images were graded by two radiologists using quality of fat suppression, severity of artifacts, and overall image quality as scoring criteria. For assessment of arterial phase capture efficiency, the number of temporal phases with angiographic phase and hepatic arterial phase was recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in quality of fat suppression, artifact severity or overall image quality between DISCO and LAVA FLEX images (P > 0.05, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The angiographic and arterial phases were captured in all 11 patients scanned using the DISCO acquisition (mean number of phases were two and three, respectively). CONCLUSION: DISCO effectively captures the fast dynamics of abdominal pathology such as hyperenhancing hepatic lesions with a high spatio-temporal resolution. Typically, 1.1 × 1.5 × 3 mm spatial resolution over 60 slices was achieved with a temporal resolution of 4-5 s.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI method called DIfferential Sub-sampling with Cartesian Ordering (DISCO) for abdominal imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional, variable density pseudo-random k-space segmentation scheme was developed and combined with a Dixon-based fat-water separation algorithm to generate high temporal resolution images with robust fat suppression and without compromise in spatial resolution or coverage. With institutional review board approval and informed consent, 11 consecutive patients referred for abdominal MRI at 3 Tesla (T) were imaged with both DISCO and a routine clinical three-dimensional SPGR-Dixon (LAVA FLEX) sequence. All images were graded by two radiologists using quality of fat suppression, severity of artifacts, and overall image quality as scoring criteria. For assessment of arterial phase capture efficiency, the number of temporal phases with angiographic phase and hepatic arterial phase was recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in quality of fat suppression, artifact severity or overall image quality between DISCO and LAVA FLEX images (P > 0.05, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The angiographic and arterial phases were captured in all 11 patients scanned using the DISCO acquisition (mean number of phases were two and three, respectively). CONCLUSION: DISCO effectively captures the fast dynamics of abdominal pathology such as hyperenhancing hepatic lesions with a high spatio-temporal resolution. Typically, 1.1 × 1.5 × 3 mm spatial resolution over 60 slices was achieved with a temporal resolution of 4-5 s.
Authors: Florian M Vogt; Gerald Antoch; Peter Hunold; Stefan Maderwald; Mark E Ladd; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Houchun H Hu; Andrew V Barger; Clifton R Haider; David G Kruger; James F Glockner; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lawrence Dougherty; Gamaliel Isaac; Mark A Rosen; Linda W Nunes; Peter J Moate; Raymond C Boston; Mitchell D Schnall; Hee Kwon Song Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Daniel I Golden; Jafi A Lipson; Melinda L Telli; James M Ford; Daniel L Rubin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Maarten W Barentsz; Valentina Taviani; Jung M Chang; Debra M Ikeda; Kanae K Miyake; Suchandrima Banerjee; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Brian A Hargreaves; Bruce L Daniel Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Mitchell A Cooper; Thanh D Nguyen; Bo Xu; Martin R Prince; Michael Elad; Yi Wang; Pascal Spincemaille Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Graham Sommer; Donna Bouley; Harcharan Gill; Bruce Daniel; Kim Butts Pauly; Chris Diederich Journal: Can J Urol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.344
Authors: Kai D Ludwig; Sean B Fain; Sydney M Nguyen; Thaddeus G Golos; Scott B Reeder; Ian M Bird; Dinesh M Shah; Oliver E Wieben; Kevin M Johnson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hina Arif-Tiwari; Bobby Kalb; Surya Chundru; Puneet Sharma; James Costello; Rainner W Guessner; Diego R Martin Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.630