PURPOSE: To determine if local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiation therapy occurs at the same site as the primary tumor before treatment, using longitudinal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to assess dominant tumor location. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study was HIPAA compliant and approved by our Committee on Human Research. We identified all patients in our institutional prostate cancer database (1996 onward) who underwent endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before radiotherapy for biopsy-proven prostate cancer and again at least 2 years after radiotherapy (n = 124). Two radiologists recorded the presence, location, and size of unequivocal dominant tumor on pre- and postradiotherapy scans. Recurrent tumor was considered to be at the same location as the baseline tumor if at least 50% of the tumor location overlapped. Clinical and biopsy data were collected from all patients. RESULTS: Nine patients had unequivocal dominant tumor on both pre- and postradiotherapy imaging, with mean pre- and postradiotherapy dominant tumor diameters of 1.8 cm (range, 1-2.2) and 1.9 cm (range, 1.4-2.6), respectively. The median follow-up interval was 7.3 years (range, 2.7-10.8). Dominant recurrent tumor was at the same location as dominant baseline tumor in 8 of 9 patients (89%). CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiation usually occurs at the same site as the dominant primary tumor at baseline, suggesting supplementary focal therapy aimed at enhancing local tumor control would be a rational addition to management. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: To determine if local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiation therapy occurs at the same site as the primary tumor before treatment, using longitudinal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to assess dominant tumor location. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study was HIPAA compliant and approved by our Committee on Human Research. We identified all patients in our institutional prostate cancer database (1996 onward) who underwent endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before radiotherapy for biopsy-proven prostate cancer and again at least 2 years after radiotherapy (n = 124). Two radiologists recorded the presence, location, and size of unequivocal dominant tumor on pre- and postradiotherapy scans. Recurrent tumor was considered to be at the same location as the baseline tumor if at least 50% of the tumor location overlapped. Clinical and biopsy data were collected from all patients. RESULTS: Nine patients had unequivocal dominant tumor on both pre- and postradiotherapy imaging, with mean pre- and postradiotherapy dominant tumor diameters of 1.8 cm (range, 1-2.2) and 1.9 cm (range, 1.4-2.6), respectively. The median follow-up interval was 7.3 years (range, 2.7-10.8). Dominant recurrent tumor was at the same location as dominant baseline tumor in 8 of 9 patients (89%). CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiation usually occurs at the same site as the dominant primary tumor at baseline, suggesting supplementary focal therapy aimed at enhancing local tumor control would be a rational addition to management. Copyright Â
Authors: U G Mueller-Lisse; D B Vigneron; H Hricak; M G Swanson; P R Carroll; A Bessette; J Scheidler; A Srivastava; R G Males; I Cha; J Kurhanewicz Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: A E Wefer; H Hricak; D B Vigneron; F V Coakley; Y Lu; J Wefer; U Mueller-Lisse; P R Carroll; J Kurhanewicz Journal: J Urol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Darko Pucar; Amita Shukla-Dave; Hedvig Hricak; Chaya S Moskowitz; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Semra Olgac; Lanie E Ebora; Peter T Scardino; Jason A Koutcher; Kristen L Zakian Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-06-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: C Menard; I C Smith; R L Somorjai; L Leboldus; R Patel; C Littman; S J Robertson; T Bezabeh Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Antonio C Westphalen; John Kurhanewicz; Rui M G Cunha; I-Chow Hsu; John Kornak; Shoujun Zhao; Fergus V Coakley Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Masoom A Haider; Peter Chung; Joan Sweet; Ants Toi; Kartik Jhaveri; Cynthia Ménard; Padraig Warde; John Trachtenberg; Gina Lockwood; Michael Milosevic Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-09-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Juanita M Crook; Peixin Zhang; Thomas M Pisansky; Edouard J Trabulsi; Mahul B Amin; William Bice; Gerard Morton; Nadeem Pervez; Eric Vigneault; Charles Catton; Jeff Michalski; Mack Roach; David Beyer; Ashesh Jani; Eric Horwitz; Viroon Donavanik; Howard Sandler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A M Kukiełka; M Hetnał; T Dąbrowski; T Walasek; P Brandys; D Nahajowski; R Kudzia; D Dybek; M Reinfuss Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-12-08 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Constantinos Zamboglou; Gesche Wieser; Steffen Hennies; Irene Rempel; Simon Kirste; Martin Soschynski; Hans Christian Rischke; Tobias Fechter; Cordula A Jilg; Mathias Langer; Philipp T Meyer; Michael Bock; Anca-Ligia Grosu Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Francesca V Mertan; Matthew D Greer; Sam Borofsky; Ismail M Kabakus; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey Journal: Top Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-06