Literature DB >> 11687679

Localized prostate cancer: effect of hormone deprivation therapy measured by using combined three-dimensional 1H MR spectroscopy and MR imaging: clinicopathologic case-controlled study.

U G Mueller-Lisse1, D B Vigneron, H Hricak, M G Swanson, P R Carroll, A Bessette, J Scheidler, A Srivastava, R G Males, I Cha, J Kurhanewicz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and three-dimensional (3D) proton MR spectroscopic imaging in localizing prostate cancer to a sextant of the gland in patients receiving hormone deprivation therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging examinations were performed in 16 hormone-treated patients and 48 nontreated matched control patients before radical prostatectomy and step-section histopathologic analysis. At MR imaging, cancer presence within the peripheral zone was assessed on a per sextant basis by two readers. At 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, cancer was identified by using (choline plus creatine)-to-citrate ratios at cutoff values of 2 and 3 SDs above mean normal peripheral zone values. Data were compared by using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the ability of combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging to localize prostate cancer in treated versus control patients. For MR imaging alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 91% and 48% (reader 1) and 75% and 60% (reader 2) in treated patients versus 79% and 60% (reader 1) and 84% and 43% (reader 2) in control patients. For 3D MR spectroscopic imaging alone (>3 SDs cutoff), higher specificity (treated, 80%; controls, 73%) but lower sensitivity (treated, 56%; controls, 53%) was attained. In treated patients, high sensitivity or specificity (up to 92%) was achieved when either or both modalities indicated cancer.
CONCLUSION: When performed within 4 months after initiating hormone deprivation therapy, combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging had the same accuracy in localizing prostate cancer as in nontreated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687679     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2211001582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Hedvig Hricak; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Reproducibility of image interpretation in MRI of the prostate: application of the sextant framework by two different radiologists.

Authors:  Ullrich Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike Mueller-Lisse; Juergen Scheidler; Gerhardt Klein; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with locally confined prostate cancer: association of prostatic citrate and metabolic atrophy with time on hormone deprivation therapy, PSA level, and biopsy Gleason score.

Authors:  Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Mark G Swanson; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter R Carroll; Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

5.  Prostate Cancer: assessing the effects of androgen-deprivation therapy using quantitative diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Yousef Mazaheri; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Joshua Berkowitz; Joshua E Lantos; Xin Pei; Michael J Zelefsky; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Combined magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Umbehr; Lucas M Bachmann; Ulrike Held; Thomas M Kessler; Tullio Sulser; Dominik Weishaupt; John Kurhanewicz; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping and spectroscopy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Kyle Petrowski; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12

8.  Proton MRS detects metabolic changes in hormone sensitive and resistant human prostate cancer models CWR22 and CWR22r.

Authors:  H Carl Le; Mihaela Lupu; Khushali Kotedia; Neal Rosen; David Solit; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Functional MR Imaging Techniques in Oncology in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  A meta-analysis of the accuracy of prostate cancer studies which use magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Peng Wang; You-min Guo; Min Liu; Yong-qian Qiang; Xiao-juan Guo; Yi-li Zhang; Xiao-Yi Duan; Qiu-Juan Zhang; Weifeng Liang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.