Literature DB >> 8886066

Detection of locally recurrent prostate cancer after cryosurgery: evaluation by transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

F Parivar1, H Hricak, K Shinohara, J Kurhanewicz, D B Vigneron, S J Nelson, P R Carroll.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the clinical usefulness of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (3-D MRSI) in detecting local recurrence of carcinoma of the prostate (CaP) in patients with detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after cryosurgery.
METHODS: In a prospective study, 25 patients who had undergone cryosurgery as primary treatment for CaP underwent endorectal MRI and 3-D MRSI, followed by TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. At the time of study, 20 patients had detectable PSA; the remaining 5 patients served as controls. All patients had random sextant and guided prostate biopsy for correlation with imaging and MR spectroscopic findings.
RESULTS: In patients with detectable PSA, MRSI identified, location-for-location, all foci of CaP and benign prostatic tissue that were detected by prostate biopsy. MRSI identified more sites with CaP than did prostate biopsy, indicating a larger volume of cancer. In 2 patients with detectable PSA and negative prostate biopsy, MRSI identified 11 voxels with viable prostatic tissue. In patients with undetectable PSA, both MRSI and prostate biopsy showed necrosis. Ultrasound and MRI were very poor tools for identifying recurrent cancer and differentiating between viable and necrotic prostate tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: 3-D MRSI is superior to TRUS and MRI in differentiating among CaP, BPH, and necrosis when local recurrence after cryosurgery is suspected. By providing chemical mapping of the prostate in contiguous voxels, the addition of spectroscopy to endorectal MRI increases the sensitivity for detection of local recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8886066     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00250-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  27 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of brain and prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; S J Nelson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Hedvig Hricak; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T--quantitative correlation with biopsy.

Authors:  Piotr Kozlowski; Silvia D Chang; Ran Meng; Burkhard Mädler; Robert Bell; Edward C Jones; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Reproducibility of image interpretation in MRI of the prostate: application of the sextant framework by two different radiologists.

Authors:  Ullrich Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike Mueller-Lisse; Juergen Scheidler; Gerhardt Klein; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  3-T multiparametric MRI characteristics of prostate cancer patients suspicious for biochemical recurrence after primary focal cryosurgery (hemiablation).

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Daniel M Halpern; Corinne C Liu; Kaitlin E Kosinski; David J Habibian; Anthony T Corcoran; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Ultrasonography in prostate cancer: current roles and potential applications in radiorecurrent disease.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Sandip M Prasad; Stephen J Savage
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations from a consensus panel.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Jurgen J Fütterer; Rajan T Gupta; Aaron Katz; Alexander Kirkham; John Kurhanewicz; Judd W Moul; Peter A Pinto; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Cary Robertson; Jean de la Rosette; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; J Stephen Jones; Osamu Ukimura; Sadhna Verma; Hessel Wijkstra; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping and spectroscopy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Kyle Petrowski; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12

Review 9.  Functional MR Imaging Techniques in Oncology in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.