Literature DB >> 21029972

Osteoporosis care in the United States after declines in reimbursements for DXA.

Burton L Hayes1, Jeffrey R Curtis, Andrew Laster, Kenneth Saag, S Bobo Tanner, Caiqin Liu, Catherine Womack, Karen C Johnson, Fazila Khaliq, Laura D Carbone.   

Abstract

In January 2007, in the United States (US), Medicare initiated a series of cuts to reimbursement for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) services performed in the nonfacility setting that by January 2010 reduced payments for these services by more than 60% compared with 2006 levels. The objectives of this study were to determine if a temporal association exists between Medicare Physician Fee Schedule changes in office-based DXA reimbursement and attendance at educational conferences for osteoporosis, physicians' perceptions of changes in their medical practices, or national trends in retail prescription medications for osteoporosis in those aged 65 and older. Compared with the 2 yr before the decline in Medicare reimbursement for DXA (2005-2006), attendance at educational meetings for osteoporosis in the US declined in the 2 yr after these cuts (2007-2008) by 6%; declines in attendance were only present in meetings selective for bone densitometry. Survey participants reported changes in DXA services with approximately one-third indicating that they had either decreased the number of DXAs they performed or declined service contracts or hardware/software updates compared with 2005-2006. The number of retail prescriptions for Food and Drug Administration-approved osteoporosis drugs (excluding estrogen compounds and raloxifene) in the age 65 and older population increased by 5.5% in the time period 2007-2008 compared with 2005-2006. However, in the last year of the study (2008), total retail prescriptions for these drugs experienced for the first time over the interval of the study, a decline (1.4%) compared with the previous year. This occurred despite a 2.6% increase in the US population age 65 and older. In conclusion, there were temporal associations noted between Medicare cuts in DXA payments in attendance at educational conferences for bone densitometry, self-report of office-based provision of DXA services in the US, and retail prescriptions for osteoporosis therapies.
Copyright © 2010 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029972      PMCID: PMC4420198          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  7 in total

1.  Continuing medical education and the physician as a learner: guide to the evidence.

Authors:  Paul E Mazmanian; David A Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Scott M Lippman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Menopause.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Missing a therapeutic window of opportunity: an audit of patients attending a tertiary teaching hospital with potentially osteoporotic hip and wrist fractures.

Authors:  M D Smith; W Ross; M J Ahern
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update on the use of pharmacologic interventions including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition for breast cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  Sarah Temin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  The effect of Medicare Part D on drug and medical spending.

Authors:  Yuting Zhang; Julie M Donohue; Judith R Lave; Gerald O'Donnell; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States.

Authors:  J R Curtis; A Laster; D J Becker; L Carbone; L C Gary; M L Kilgore; R S Matthews; M A Morrisey; K G Saag; S B Tanner; E Delzell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

  7 in total
  17 in total

1.  Trends and Determinants of Osteoporosis Treatment and Screening in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gulsen Ozen; Diane L Kamen; Ted R Mikuls; Bryant R England; Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  The Fracture Liaison Service to close the osteoporosis care gap: a leadership educational model for undergraduate and postgraduate trainees.

Authors:  Micah Yu; Christina Downey; Karina D Torralba
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Trends in osteoporosis and low bone mass in older US adults, 2005-2006 through 2013-2014.

Authors:  A C Looker; N Sarafrazi Isfahani; B Fan; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Predicting osteoporosis medication receipt in Veterans with a spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Frances M Weaver; Brian Le; Cara Ray; Scott Miskevics; Beverly Gonzalez; Laura D Carbone
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Qualitative Evaluation of Digital Hand X-rays Is Not a Reliable Method to Assess Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Andrew J Miller; Christopher Jones; Frederick Liss; Jack Abboudi; William Kirkpatrick; Pedro Beredjiklian
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-01

Review 6.  Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis Using Computed Tomography: State of the Art and Argument for Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Ashley A Weaver; Robert J Ward; John M Boone; Robert D Boutin
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in rural women with limited access to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  K Ito; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Effect of Medicare reimbursement reduction for imaging services on osteoporosis screening rates.

Authors:  Carrie McAdam-Marx; Sudhir Unni; Xiangyang Ye; Scott Nelson; Nancy A Nickman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Trends in osteoporosis diagnosis and management in Australia.

Authors:  Leon Smith; Stephen Wilson
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.879

10.  Digital X-ray radiogrammetry of hand or wrist radiographs can predict hip fracture risk--a study in 5,420 women and 2,837 men.

Authors:  M L Wilczek; J Kälvesten; J Algulin; O Beiki; T B Brismar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.