Literature DB >> 22314705

Combining NMR ensembles and molecular dynamics simulations provides more realistic models of protein structures in solution and leads to better chemical shift prediction.

Juuso Lehtivarjo1, Kari Tuppurainen, Tommi Hassinen, Reino Laatikainen, Mikael Peräkylä.   

Abstract

While chemical shifts are invaluable for obtaining structural information from proteins, they also offer one of the rare ways to obtain information about protein dynamics. A necessary tool in transforming chemical shifts into structural and dynamic information is chemical shift prediction. In our previous work we developed a method for 4D prediction of protein (1)H chemical shifts in which molecular motions, the 4th dimension, were modeled using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Although the approach clearly improved the prediction, the X-ray structures and single NMR conformers used in the model cannot be considered fully realistic models of protein in solution. In this work, NMR ensembles (NMRE) were used to expand the conformational space of proteins (e.g. side chains, flexible loops, termini), followed by MD simulations for each conformer to map the local fluctuations. Compared with the non-dynamic model, the NMRE+MD model gave 6-17% lower root-mean-square (RMS) errors for different backbone nuclei. The improved prediction indicates that NMR ensembles with MD simulations can be used to obtain a more realistic picture of protein structures in solutions and moreover underlines the importance of short and long time-scale dynamics for the prediction. The RMS errors of the NMRE+MD model were 0.24, 0.43, 0.98, 1.03, 1.16 and 2.39 ppm for (1)Hα, (1)HN, (13)Cα, (13)Cβ, (13)CO and backbone (15)N chemical shifts, respectively. The model is implemented in the prediction program 4DSPOT, available at http://www.uef.fi/4dspot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22314705     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-012-9609-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  26 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Mapping of protein structural ensembles by chemical shifts.

Authors:  Kumaran Baskaran; Konrad Brunner; Claudia E Munte; Hans Robert Kalbitzer
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Using NMR chemical shifts as structural restraints in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins.

Authors:  Paul Robustelli; Kai Kohlhoff; Andrea Cavalli; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Cooperative hydrogen bonding effects are key determinants of backbone amide proton chemical shifts in proteins.

Authors:  Laura L Parker; Andrew R Houk; Jan H Jensen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

6.  Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Andrea Cavalli; Xavier Salvatella; Christopher M Dobson; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Oliver Lange; Frank Delaglio; Paolo Rossi; James M Aramini; Gaohua Liu; Alexander Eletsky; Yibing Wu; Kiran K Singarapu; Alexander Lemak; Alexandr Ignatchenko; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Thomas Szyperski; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker; Ad Bax
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  4D prediction of protein (1)H chemical shifts.

Authors:  Juuso Lehtivarjo; Tommi Hassinen; Samuli-Petrus Korhonen; Mikael Peräkylä; Reino Laatikainen
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 9.  Chemical shift prediction for protein structure calculation and quality assessment using an optimally parameterized force field.

Authors:  Jakob T Nielsen; Hamid R Eghbalnia; Niels Chr Nielsen
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 9.795

10.  CS23D: a web server for rapid protein structure generation using NMR chemical shifts and sequence data.

Authors:  David S Wishart; David Arndt; Mark Berjanskii; Peter Tang; Jianjun Zhou; Guohui Lin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

1.  PPM_One: a static protein structure based chemical shift predictor.

Authors:  Dawei Li; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  PPM: a side-chain and backbone chemical shift predictor for the assessment of protein conformational ensembles.

Authors:  Da-Wei Li; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Interpreting protein structural dynamics from NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Paul Robustelli; Kate A Stafford; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Ensemble MD simulations restrained via crystallographic data: accurate structure leads to accurate dynamics.

Authors:  Yi Xue; Nikolai R Skrynnikov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Correlation of chemical shifts predicted by molecular dynamics simulations for partially disordered proteins.

Authors:  Jerome M Karp; Ertan Eryilmaz; Ertan Erylimaz; David Cowburn
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 6.  Chemical shifts in biomolecules.

Authors:  David A Case
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  NMR Structure and Dynamics of the Resuscitation Promoting Factor RpfC Catalytic Domain.

Authors:  Vincenzo Maione; Alessia Ruggiero; Luigi Russo; Alfonso De Simone; Paolo Vincenzo Pedone; Gaetano Malgieri; Rita Berisio; Carla Isernia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Unconstrained Enhanced Sampling for Free Energy Calculations of Biomolecules: A Review.

Authors:  Yinglong Miao; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Mol Simul       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.178

9.  Molecular dynamics ensemble refinement of the heterogeneous native state of NCBD using chemical shifts and NOEs.

Authors:  Elena Papaleo; Carlo Camilloni; Kaare Teilum; Michele Vendruscolo; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.