Literature DB >> 22381384

Interpreting protein structural dynamics from NMR chemical shifts.

Paul Robustelli1, Kate A Stafford, Arthur G Palmer.   

Abstract

In this investigation, semiempirical NMR chemical shift prediction methods are used to evaluate the dynamically averaged values of backbone chemical shifts obtained from unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins. MD-averaged chemical shift predictions generally improve agreement with experimental values when compared to predictions made from static X-ray structures. Improved chemical shift predictions result from population-weighted sampling of multiple conformational states and from sampling smaller fluctuations within conformational basins. Improved chemical shift predictions also result from discrete changes to conformations observed in X-ray structures, which may result from crystal contacts, and are not always reflective of conformational dynamics in solution. Chemical shifts are sensitive reporters of fluctuations in backbone and side chain torsional angles, and averaged (1)H chemical shifts are particularly sensitive reporters of fluctuations in aromatic ring positions and geometries of hydrogen bonds. In addition, poor predictions of MD-averaged chemical shifts can identify spurious conformations and motions observed in MD simulations that may result from force field deficiencies or insufficient sampling and can also suggest subsets of conformational space that are more consistent with experimental data. These results suggest that the analysis of dynamically averaged NMR chemical shifts from MD simulations can serve as a powerful approach for characterizing protein motions in atomistic detail.
© 2012 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22381384      PMCID: PMC3324661          DOI: 10.1021/ja300265w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  45 in total

1.  RefDB: a database of uniformly referenced protein chemical shifts.

Authors:  Haiyan Zhang; Stephen Neal; David S Wishart
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

4.  Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin-relaxation.

Authors:  Nikola Trbovic; Byungchan Kim; Richard A Friesner; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-05-01

5.  Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Andrea Cavalli; Xavier Salvatella; Christopher M Dobson; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Oliver Lange; Frank Delaglio; Paolo Rossi; James M Aramini; Gaohua Liu; Alexander Eletsky; Yibing Wu; Kiran K Singarapu; Alexander Lemak; Alexandr Ignatchenko; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Thomas Szyperski; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker; Ad Bax
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  4D prediction of protein (1)H chemical shifts.

Authors:  Juuso Lehtivarjo; Tommi Hassinen; Samuli-Petrus Korhonen; Mikael Peräkylä; Reino Laatikainen
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Constant pH molecular dynamics with proton tautomerism.

Authors:  Jana Khandogin; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06

10.  CS23D: a web server for rapid protein structure generation using NMR chemical shifts and sequence data.

Authors:  David S Wishart; David Arndt; Mark Berjanskii; Peter Tang; Jianjun Zhou; Guohui Lin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  A community resource of experimental data for NMR / X-ray crystal structure pairs.

Authors:  John K Everett; Roberto Tejero; Sarath B K Murthy; Thomas B Acton; James M Aramini; Michael C Baran; Jordi Benach; John R Cort; Alexander Eletsky; Farhad Forouhar; Rongjin Guan; Alexandre P Kuzin; Hsiau-Wei Lee; Gaohua Liu; Rajeswari Mani; Binchen Mao; Jeffrey L Mills; Alexander F Montelione; Kari Pederson; Robert Powers; Theresa Ramelot; Paolo Rossi; Jayaraman Seetharaman; David Snyder; G V T Swapna; Sergey M Vorobiev; Yibing Wu; Rong Xiao; Yunhuang Yang; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; John F Hunt; Michael A Kennedy; James H Prestegard; Thomas Szyperski; Liang Tong; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Protein dynamics elucidated by NMR technique.

Authors:  Conggang Li; Chun Tang; Maili Liu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 14.870

3.  Cyclophilin A catalyzes proline isomerization by an electrostatic handle mechanism.

Authors:  Carlo Camilloni; Aleksandr B Sahakyan; Michael J Holliday; Nancy G Isern; Fengli Zhang; Elan Z Eisenmesser; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  PPM_One: a static protein structure based chemical shift predictor.

Authors:  Dawei Li; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Assessing and refining molecular dynamics simulations of proteins with nuclear magnetic resonance data.

Authors:  Jane R Allison
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2012-09-01

6.  PPM: a side-chain and backbone chemical shift predictor for the assessment of protein conformational ensembles.

Authors:  Da-Wei Li; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Structural dynamics and conformational equilibria of SERCA regulatory proteins in membranes by solid-state NMR restrained simulations.

Authors:  Alfonso De Simone; Kaustubh R Mote; Gianluigi Veglia
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Ensemble MD simulations restrained via crystallographic data: accurate structure leads to accurate dynamics.

Authors:  Yi Xue; Nikolai R Skrynnikov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Conformational dynamics of a regulator of G-protein signaling protein reveals a mechanism of allosteric inhibition by a small molecule.

Authors:  Harish Vashisth; Andrew J Storaska; Richard R Neubig; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 10.  Chemical shifts in biomolecules.

Authors:  David A Case
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.