Literature DB >> 24324175

Evidence for soft bounds in Ubuntu package sizes and mammalian body masses.

Marco Gherardi1, Salvatore Mandrà, Bruno Bassetti, Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino.   

Abstract

The development of a complex system depends on the self-coordinated action of a large number of agents, often determining unexpected global behavior. The case of software evolution has great practical importance: knowledge of what is to be considered atypical can guide developers in recognizing and reacting to abnormal behavior. Although the initial framework of a theory of software exists, the current theoretical achievements do not fully capture existing quantitative data or predict future trends. Here we show that two elementary laws describe the evolution of package sizes in a Linux-based operating system: first, relative changes in size follow a random walk with non-Gaussian jumps; second, each size change is bounded by a limit that is dependent on the starting size, an intriguing behavior that we call "soft bound." Our approach is based on data analysis and on a simple theoretical model, which is able to reproduce empirical details without relying on any adjustable parameter and generates definite predictions. The same analysis allows us to formulate and support the hypothesis that a similar mechanism is shaping the distribution of mammalian body sizes, via size-dependent constraints during cladogenesis. Whereas generally accepted approaches struggle to reproduce the large-mass shoulder displayed by the distribution of extant mammalian species, this is a natural consequence of the softly bounded nature of the process. Additionally, the hypothesis that this model is valid has the relevant implication that, contrary to a common assumption, mammalian masses are still evolving, albeit very slowly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bounded diffusion; cladogenetic diffusion; macroevolutionary patterns; multiplicative processes

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24324175      PMCID: PMC3876239          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1311124110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  Cope's rule, hypercarnivory, and extinction in North American canids.

Authors:  Blaire Van Valkenburgh; Xiaoming Wang; John Damuth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The evolution of maximum body size of terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Felisa A Smith; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; Tamar Dayan; S K Morgan Ernest; Alistair R Evans; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Christy McCain; Jordan G Okie; Juha J Saarinen; Richard M Sibly; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica Theodor; Mark D Uhen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The scaling laws of human travel.

Authors:  D Brockmann; L Hufnagel; T Geisel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolutionary model of species body mass diversification.

Authors:  A Clauset; S Redner
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Empirical tests of Zipf's law mechanism in open source Linux distribution.

Authors:  T Maillart; D Sornette; S Spaeth; G von Krogh
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  A Lévy flight for light.

Authors:  Pierre Barthelemy; Jacopo Bertolotti; Diederik S Wiersma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Universal distribution of component frequencies in biological and technological systems.

Authors:  Tin Yau Pang; Sergei Maslov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Scaling body size fluctuations.

Authors:  Andrea Giometto; Florian Altermatt; Francesco Carrara; Amos Maritan; Andrea Rinaldo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A new mammaliaform from the early Jurassic and evolution of mammalian characteristics.

Authors:  Z X Luo; A W Crompton; A L Sun
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  How large should whales be?

Authors:  Aaron Clauset
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterizing the size and shape of sea ice floes.

Authors:  Marco Gherardi; Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Diversity and disparity through time in the adaptive radiation of Antarctic notothenioid fishes.

Authors:  M Colombo; M Damerau; R Hanel; W Salzburger; M Matschiner
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.