Literature DB >> 23760865

Effects of allometry, productivity and lifestyle on rates and limits of body size evolution.

Jordan G Okie1, Alison G Boyer, James H Brown, Daniel P Costa, S K Morgan Ernest, Alistair R Evans, Mikael Fortelius, John L Gittleman, Marcus J Hamilton, Larisa E Harding, Kari Lintulaakso, S Kathleen Lyons, Juha J Saarinen, Felisa A Smith, Patrick R Stephens, Jessica Theodor, Mark D Uhen, Richard M Sibly.   

Abstract

Body size affects nearly all aspects of organismal biology, so it is important to understand the constraints and dynamics of body size evolution. Despite empirical work on the macroevolution and macroecology of minimum and maximum size, there is little general quantitative theory on rates and limits of body size evolution. We present a general theory that integrates individual productivity, the lifestyle component of the slow-fast life-history continuum, and the allometric scaling of generation time to predict a clade's evolutionary rate and asymptotic maximum body size, and the shape of macroevolutionary trajectories during diversifying phases of size evolution. We evaluate this theory using data on the evolution of clade maximum body sizes in mammals during the Cenozoic. As predicted, clade evolutionary rates and asymptotic maximum sizes are larger in more productive clades (e.g. baleen whales), which represent the fast end of the slow-fast lifestyle continuum, and smaller in less productive clades (e.g. primates). The allometric scaling exponent for generation time fundamentally alters the shape of evolutionary trajectories, so allometric effects should be accounted for in models of phenotypic evolution and interpretations of macroevolutionary body size patterns. This work highlights the intimate interplay between the macroecological and macroevolutionary dynamics underlying the generation and maintenance of morphological diversity.

Keywords:  evolutionary rate; macroecology; mammal macroevolution; maximum body size; metabolic theory of ecology; slow–fast life-history continuum

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23760865      PMCID: PMC3712421          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  36 in total

Review 1.  Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process.

Authors:  P D Gingerich
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Biology, not environment, drives major patterns in maximum tetrapod body size through time.

Authors:  Roland B Sookias; Roger B J Benson; Richard J Butler
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Shifts in metabolic scaling, production, and efficiency across major evolutionary transitions of life.

Authors:  John P DeLong; Jordan G Okie; Melanie E Moses; Richard M Sibly; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The evolution of maximum body size of terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Felisa A Smith; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; Tamar Dayan; S K Morgan Ernest; Alistair R Evans; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Christy McCain; Jordan G Okie; Juha J Saarinen; Richard M Sibly; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica Theodor; Mark D Uhen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock.

Authors:  James F Gillooly; Andrew P Allen; Geoffrey B West; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling.

Authors:  P D Gingerich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Niches, body sizes, and the disassembly of mammal communities on the Sunda Shelf islands.

Authors:  Jordan G Okie; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  How big should a mammal be? A macroecological look at mammalian body size over space and time.

Authors:  Felisa A Smith; S Kathleen Lyons
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Mutation rates in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Sankar Subramanian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  The genome as a life-history character: why rate of molecular evolution varies between mammal species.

Authors:  Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Yadvinder Malhi; Christopher E Doughty; Mauro Galetti; Felisa A Smith; Jens-Christian Svenning; John W Terborgh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The evolution of bacterial cell size: the internal diffusion-constraint hypothesis.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Cyrille Violle; Nathalie Fromin; Roula Jabbour-Zahab; Brian J Enquist; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Patterns of maximum body size evolution in Cenozoic land mammals: eco-evolutionary processes and abiotic forcing.

Authors:  Juha J Saarinen; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; S K Morgan Ernest; Alistair R Evans; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Jordan G Okie; Richard M Sibly; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica Theodor; Mark D Uhen; Felisa A Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The relationship of mammal survivorship and body mass modeled by metabolic and vitality theories.

Authors:  James J Anderson
Journal:  Popul Ecol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.100

5.  Studying biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships in experimental microcosms among islands.

Authors:  Anette Teittinen; Janne Soininen; Leena Virta
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.431

6.  Towards cancer-aware life-history modelling.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Contrasting Responses to Harvesting and Environmental Drivers of Fast and Slow Life History Species.

Authors:  Antoni Quetglas; Lucía Rueda; Diego Alvarez-Berastegui; Beatriz Guijarro; Enric Massutí
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dynamics of starvation and recovery predict extinction risk and both Damuth's law and Cope's rule.

Authors:  Justin D Yeakel; Christopher P Kempes; Sidney Redner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.