Literature DB >> 22308356

Optimizing ring assembly reveals the strength of weak interactions.

Eric J Deeds1, John A Bachman, Walter Fontana.   

Abstract

Most cellular processes rely on large multiprotein complexes that must assemble into a well-defined quaternary structure in order to function. A number of prominent examples, including the 20S core particle of the proteasome and the AAA+ family of ATPases, contain ring-like structures. Developing an understanding of the complex assembly pathways employed by ring-like structures requires a characterization of the problems these pathways have had to overcome as they evolved. In this work, we use computational models to uncover one such problem: a deadlocked plateau in the assembly dynamics. When the molecular interactions between subunits are too strong, this plateau leads to significant delays in assembly and a reduction in steady-state yield. Conversely, if the interactions are too weak, assembly delays are caused by the instability of crucial intermediates. Intermediate affinities thus maximize the efficiency of assembly for homomeric ring-like structures. In the case of heteromeric rings, we find that rings including at least one weak interaction can assemble efficiently and robustly. Estimation of affinities from solved structures of ring-like complexes indicates that heteromeric rings tend to contain a weak interaction, confirming our prediction. In addition to providing an evolutionary rationale for structural features of rings, our work forms the basis for understanding the complex assembly pathways of stacked rings like the proteasome and suggests principles that would aid in the design of synthetic ring-like structures that self-assemble efficiently.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22308356      PMCID: PMC3289332          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1113095109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  Multiple routes lead to the native state in the energy landscape of the beta-trefoil family.

Authors:  Leslie L Chavez; Shachi Gosavi; Patricia A Jennings; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet.

Authors:  Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome.

Authors:  Archana Belle; Amos Tanay; Ledion Bitincka; Ron Shamir; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists.

Authors:  B Alberts
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-02-06       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Computer-based analysis of the binding steps in protein complex formation.

Authors:  D Bray; S Lay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Mechanical aspects of apoptosome assembly.

Authors:  Yigong Shi
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 8.382

7.  A mathematical model for apoptosome assembly: the optimal cytochrome c/Apaf-1 ratio.

Authors:  Jun Nakabayashi; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Topological frustration and the folding of interleukin-1 beta.

Authors:  Shachi Gosavi; Leslie L Chavez; Patricia A Jennings; José N Onuchic
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  3D complex: a structural classification of protein complexes.

Authors:  Emmanuel D Levy; Jose B Pereira-Leal; Cyrus Chothia; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Stochastic dynamics of macromolecular-assembly networks.

Authors:  Leonor Saiz; Jose M G Vilar
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Systems biophysics of gene expression.

Authors:  Jose M G Vilar; Leonor Saiz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Reaction dynamics analysis of a reconstituted Escherichia coli protein translation system by computational modeling.

Authors:  Tomoaki Matsuura; Naoki Tanimura; Kazufumi Hosoda; Tetsuya Yomo; Yoshihiro Shimizu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Understand the Functions of Scaffold Proteins in Cell Signaling by a Mesoscopic Simulation Method.

Authors:  Zhaoqian Su; Kalyani Dhusia; Yinghao Wu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The bacterial type III secretion system as a target for developing new antibiotics.

Authors:  Andrew C McShan; Roberto N De Guzman
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.817

Review 5.  Computational approaches to macromolecular interactions in the cell.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser; Eric J Deeds
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Deciphering the molecular organization of GET pathway chaperones through native mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Fabian Giska; Malaiyalam Mariappan; Moitrayee Bhattacharyya; Kallol Gupta
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Transcription factors perform a 2-step search of the nucleus.

Authors:  Max Valentín Staller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Assembly of the 20S proteasome.

Authors:  Mary J Kunjappu; Mark Hochstrasser
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-03-16

9.  Membrane proteins can have high kinetic stability.

Authors:  Robert E Jefferson; Tracy M Blois; James U Bowie
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Machines vs. ensembles: effective MAPK signaling through heterogeneous sets of protein complexes.

Authors:  Ryan Suderman; Eric J Deeds
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.