Literature DB >> 9391053

Computer-based analysis of the binding steps in protein complex formation.

D Bray1, S Lay.   

Abstract

Computer models were used to examine whether and under what conditions the multimeric protein complex is inhibited by high concentrations of one of its components-an effect analogous to the prozone phenomenon in precipitin tests. A series of idealized simple "ball-and-stick" structures representing small oligomeric complexes of protein molecules formed by reversible binding reactions were analyzed to determine the binding steps leading to each structure. The equilibrium state of each system was then determined over a range of starting concentrations and Kds and the steady-state concentration of structurally complete oligomer calculated for each situation. A strong inhibitory effect at high concentrations was shown by any protein molecule forming a bridge between two or more separable parts of the complex. By contrast, proteins linked to the outside of the complex by a single bond showed no inhibition whatsoever at any concentration. Nonbridging, multivalent proteins in the body of the complex could show an inhibitory effect or not depending on the structure of the complex and the strength of its bonds. On the basis of this study, we suggest that the prozone phenomenon will occur widely in living cells and that it could be a crucial factor in the regulation of protein complex formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9391053      PMCID: PMC28333          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cellular concentrations of enzymes and their substrates.

Authors:  K R Albe; M H Butler; B E Wright
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-03-22       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Role of the CheW protein in bacterial chemotaxis: overexpression is equivalent to absence.

Authors:  D A Sanders; B Mendez; D E Koshland
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Role of CheW protein in coupling membrane receptors to the intracellular signaling system of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J D Liu; J S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Signal transduction in bacteria: CheW forms a reversible complex with the protein kinase CheA.

Authors:  J A Gegner; F W Dahlquist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Protein modules and signalling networks.

Authors:  T Pawson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A computer program for the analysis of protein complex formation.

Authors:  S Lay; D Bray
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1997-08

Review 7.  Biogenesis of the red blood cell membrane-skeleton and the control of erythroid morphogenesis.

Authors:  E Lazarides; C Woods
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Biol       Date:  1989

8.  Binding equations for interacting systems comprising multivalent acceptor and bivalent ligand: application to antigen-antibody systems.

Authors:  P D Calvert; L W Nichol; W H Sawyer
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 9.  Molecular glue: kinase anchoring and scaffold proteins.

Authors:  M C Faux; J D Scott
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE PRECIPITIN REACTION BETWEEN TYPE III PNEUMOCOCCUS POLYSACCHARIDE AND PURIFIED HOMOLOGOUS ANTIBODY.

Authors:  M Heidelberger; F E Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1929-11-30       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  49 in total

1.  DNA specificity enhanced by sequential binding of protein monomers.

Authors:  J J Kohler; S J Metallo; T L Schneider; A Schepartz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties.

Authors:  A Levchenko; J Bruck; P W Sternberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The molecular scaffold KSR1 regulates the proliferative and oncogenic potential of cells.

Authors:  Robert L Kortum; Robert E Lewis
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Size and composition of membrane protein clusters predicted by Monte Carlo analysis.

Authors:  Jacki Goldman; Steven Andrews; Dennis Bray
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Optimizing ring assembly reveals the strength of weak interactions.

Authors:  Eric J Deeds; John A Bachman; Walter Fontana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Speedy A, Cdk2, p27 triangle.

Authors:  Matthew R Dewhurst; Philipp Kaldis
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  The Prozone Effect Accounts for the Paradoxical Function of the Cdk-Binding Protein Suc1/Cks.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Ha; Sun Young Kim; James E Ferrell
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Selective role for RGS12 as a Ras/Raf/MEK scaffold in nerve growth factor-mediated differentiation.

Authors:  Melinda D Willard; Francis S Willard; Xiaoyan Li; Steven D Cappell; William D Snider; David P Siderovski
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  FOXP3 interactions with histone acetyltransferase and class II histone deacetylases are required for repression.

Authors:  Bin Li; Arabinda Samanta; Xiaomin Song; Kathryn T Iacono; Kathryn Bembas; Ran Tao; Samik Basu; James L Riley; Wayne W Hancock; Yuan Shen; Sandra J Saouaf; Mark I Greene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  DNA-mediated assembly of weakly interacting DNA-binding protein subunits: in vitro recruitment of phage 434 repressor and yeast GCN4 DNA-binding domains.

Authors:  Corrado Guarnaccia; Bakthisaran Raman; Sotir Zahariev; András Simoncsits; Sándor Pongor
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.