INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the visibility of stents using high-resolution computed tomography (CT) acquisitions acquired with flat panel detector (XperCT, Allura series, Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands) for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: On a 24-month period, 48 patients endovascularly treated by coiling and stenting (59 stents) for intracranial aneurysms were explored by flat panel detector CT technique. A sequence of 620 2D images was acquired over an angle of 240° using a 1,024 × 1,024 pixel matrix detector within a 48-cm field of view. The images were retrospectively analyzed independently by two neuroradiologists. Evaluation criteria were percentage of visualization of the stents and stent deployment (kinking or unsatisfactory deployment of the stent). RESULTS: Evaluation of the stent was feasible for all the patients. Stent visibility by XperCT was overall estimated at 76% of the stent length. Difficulties to analyze the stents were related to coil artifacts but not to packing density or aneurysm location. Stent length visualization was higher when the acquisition was performed before additional coiling (P < 0.0001). Mild kinking/misdeployment was noticed in 22% of the cases. CONCLUSION: XperCT technique provides multiplanar and 3D reconstructions that allows for a satisfying visualization of intracranial stents. This CT-like acquisition should be performed after the stent deployment and before coiling, in order to obtain better stent visualization.
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the visibility of stents using high-resolution computed tomography (CT) acquisitions acquired with flat panel detector (XperCT, Allura series, Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands) for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: On a 24-month period, 48 patients endovascularly treated by coiling and stenting (59 stents) for intracranial aneurysms were explored by flat panel detector CT technique. A sequence of 620 2D images was acquired over an angle of 240° using a 1,024 × 1,024 pixel matrix detector within a 48-cm field of view. The images were retrospectively analyzed independently by two neuroradiologists. Evaluation criteria were percentage of visualization of the stents and stent deployment (kinking or unsatisfactory deployment of the stent). RESULTS: Evaluation of the stent was feasible for all the patients. Stent visibility by XperCT was overall estimated at 76% of the stent length. Difficulties to analyze the stents were related to coil artifacts but not to packing density or aneurysm location. Stent length visualization was higher when the acquisition was performed before additional coiling (P < 0.0001). Mild kinking/misdeployment was noticed in 22% of the cases. CONCLUSION: XperCT technique provides multiplanar and 3D reconstructions that allows for a satisfying visualization of intracranial stents. This CT-like acquisition should be performed after the stent deployment and before coiling, in order to obtain better stent visualization.
Authors: Götz Benndorf; Charles M Strother; Benjamin Claus; Ramin Naeini; Hesham Morsi; Richard Klucznik; Michael E Mawad Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: David Fiorella; Felipe C Albuquerque; Vivek R Deshmukh; Henry H Woo; Peter A Rasmussen; Thomas J Masaryk; Cameron G McDougall Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: M Piotin; S Mandai; K J Murphy; K Sugiu; P Gailloud; J B Martin; D A Rüfenacht Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alessandra Biondi; Vallabh Janardhan; Jeffrey M Katz; Kimberly Salvaggio; Howard A Riina; Y Pierre Gobin Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: A Rouchaud; C Ramana; W Brinjikji; Y-H Ding; D Dai; T Gunderson; J Cebral; D F Kallmes; R Kadirvel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Bernhard Scholz; Christopher Rohkohl; Yiannis Kyriakou; Alexander Mohr; Peter Schramm; Dorothee Wachter; Katrin Wasser; Michael Knauth Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: A Rouchaud; O Leclerc; Y Benayoun; S Saleme; Y Camilleri; F D'Argento; M-P Boncoeur; P-Y Robert; C Mounayer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jean-Christophe Gentric; Robert Fahed; Tim E Darsaut; Igor Salazkin; Daniel Roy; Jean Raymond Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 1.610