Inefficient cellular delivery limits the landscape of macromolecular drugs. Boronic acids readily form boronate esters with the 1,2- and 1,3-diols of saccharides, such as those that coat the surface of mammalian cells. Here pendant boronic acids are shown to enhance the cytosolic delivery of a protein toxin. Thus, boronates are a noncationic carrier that can deliver a polar macromolecule into mammalian cells.
Inefficient cellular delivery limits the landscape of macromolecular drugs. Boronic acids readily form boronate esters with the 1,2- and 1,3-diols of saccharides, such as those that coat the surface of mammalian cells. Here pendant boronic acids are shown to enhance the cytosolic delivery of a protein toxin. Thus, boronates are a noncationic carrier that can deliver a polar macromolecule into mammalian cells.
The utility of many biologic
drugs is limited by inefficient cellular delivery.[1] Previous efforts to overcome this limitation have focused
largely on the use of cationic domains—peptidic (e.g., HIV–TAT,
penetratin, and nonaarginine) or nonpeptidic (e.g., PAMAM dendrimers
and polyethylenimine)—to enhance the attraction between a chemotherapeutic
agent and the anionic cell surface.[2] Natural
ligands (e.g., folic acid, substance P, and the RGD tripeptide) have
also been used to facilitate cellular delivery by targeting agents
to specific cell-surface receptors.[3] Although
these methods have achieved some success, additional delivery strategies
are desirable.The cell surface is coated with a dense forest
of polysaccharides
known as the glycocalyx.[4] We anticipated
that targeting therapeutic agents to the glycocalyx would enhance
their cellular delivery, as has been demonstrated with lectin conjugates.[5] Boronic acids readily form boronate esters with
the 1,2- and 1,3-diols of saccharides,[6] including those in the glycocalyx.[7] In
addition, boronate groups are compatible with human physiology, appearing
in chemotherapeutic agents and other remedies.[8] Further, pendant boronic acids conjugated to polyethylenimine have
been shown to enhance DNA transfection.[9] Here we demonstrate the use of pendant boronic acids to mediate
the delivery of a protein into the cytosol of mammalian cells.Bovinepancreatic ribonuclease (RNase A) is a small, well-characterized
enzyme that has been the object of much seminal work in protein chemistry.[10] If this ribonuclease can gain access to the
RNA that resides in the cytosol, then its prodigious catalytic activity
can lead to cell death.[11] Hence, RNase
A can serve as an ideal model for assessing the delivery of a protein
into the cytosol (rather than an endosome) because success can be
discerned with assays of cytotoxic activity.Initially, we quantified
the affinity of simple boronic acids to
relevant saccharides. Sialic acid is of particular interest because
of its abundance in the glycocalyx of cancer cells.[12] Phenylboronic acid (PBA) binds with higher affinity to
sialic acid than to other pyranose saccharides,[13] suggesting that simple boronic acids could target chemotherapeutic
agents selectively to tumors. 2-Hydroxymethylphenylboronic acid (benzoxaborole[14]) has the highest reported affinity for pyranose
saccharides,[13,15] which are abundant in the glycocalyx;
hence, we reasoned that benzoxaborole could be an ideal boronate for
drug delivery. We used 1H NMR spectroscopy to evaluate
directly the affinity of PBA and benzoxaborole for fructose, glucose,
and N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), which contains
a sialic acid moiety, under physiological conditions. Our Ka values (Table 1) are
in accord with values determined by other workers using competition
and other assays (Table S1 in the Supporting Information).[13a,13c,15] We found that
benzoxaborole has a greater affinity than PBA for each saccharide
in our panel and that benzoxaborole, like PBA, has a greater affinity
for Neu5Ac than for glucose. Accordingly, we chose benzoxaborole for
our boronate-mediated delivery studies.
Table 1
Values of Ka (M–1) for Boronic Acids and Saccharidesa
Each value is the mean ± standard
deviation (SD) for ≥15 measurements in 0.10 M sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2% (v/v) D2O.
Each value is the mean ± standard
deviation (SD) for ≥15 measurements in 0.10 M sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2% (v/v) D2O.To display benzoxaborole moieties on RNase A, we conjugated
5-amino-2-hydroxymethylphenylboronic
acid (1) to protein carboxyl groups by condensation using
a carbodiimide (Figure 1). Of the 11 carboxyl
groups of RNase A, 7.5 ± 2.0 were
condensed with boronate 1, as determined by mass spectrometry.
Figure 1
Boronation
of RNase A and its putative mechanism for expediting
cellular delivery. The location of each carboxyl group of RNase A
is depicted in the ribbon diagram (PDB entry 7rsa(16)).
Boronation
of RNase A and its putative mechanism for expediting
cellular delivery. The location of each carboxyl group of RNase A
is depicted in the ribbon diagram (PDB entry 7rsa(16)).Boronation should increase the affinity of a protein
for oligosaccharides.
To test this hypothesis qualitatively, we measured the retention of
boronated and unmodified RNase A on a column of heparin, a common
physiological polysaccharide. Boronated RNase A was indeed retained
longer on the column (Figure 2). If the prolonged
retention were due to boron–saccharide complexation, then fructose
in the buffer should compete with immobilized heparin for boron complexation.
When these conditions were employed, the retention of boronated RNase
A was indeed diminished (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Elution profile
of a mixture of unmodified RNase A (eluting in
region A) and boronated RNase A (eluting in region B) from a column
of immobilized heparin in the absence (solid lines) or presence (dashed
lines) of fructose (0.10 M). Black lines, A280 nm; gray lines, conductivity.
Elution profile
of a mixture of unmodified RNase A (eluting in
region A) and boronated RNase A (eluting in region B) from a column
of immobilized heparin in the absence (solid lines) or presence (dashed
lines) of fructose (0.10 M). Black lines, A280 nm; gray lines, conductivity.To evaluate the enhanced affinity of boronated
RNase A for oligosaccharides,
we measured its affinity for gangliosideGD3 within a 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine liposome. This ganglioside has
two sialic acid residues and is overexpressed on the surface of cancer
cells.[17] By using fluorescence polarization
to analyze binding, we found that boronation increased the affinity
of the protein for the ganglioside, an effect that was abrogated by
fructose (Figure 3). The Kd value of boronated protein for GD3ganglioside liposomes
was (53 ± 11) μM. This affinity is ∼440-fold greater
than that for the binding of a single benzoxaborole to Neu5Ac (Table 1), consistent with a multivalent interaction between
the boronated protein and the ganglioside.
Figure 3
Fluorescence polarization
assay of ribonucleases binding ganglioside-labeled
liposomes in the presence or absence of 10 mM fructose. Data were
normalized to the polarization of each ribonuclease incubated with
nonextruded DOPC lipids. Each data point represents the mean ±
SD for triplicate experiments. Asterisks indicate values with p < 0.05.
Fluorescence polarization
assay of ribonucleases binding ganglioside-labeled
liposomes in the presence or absence of 10 mM fructose. Data were
normalized to the polarization of each ribonuclease incubated with
nonextruded DOPClipids. Each data point represents the mean ±
SD for triplicate experiments. Asterisks indicate values with p < 0.05.Encouraged by the enhanced affinity of the boronated
protein for
oligosaccharides in vitro, we sought to test our hypothesis that boronate
conjugation increases cellular uptake. To quantify cellular internalization,
we used a fluorophore-labeled protein and flow cytometry. To determine
concurrently whether the pendant boronates would elicit selectivity
for cells with higher quantities of cell-surface sialic acid, we employed
a line of Chinese hamster ovary cells (Lec-2) that have lower levels
of sialic acid in their glycocalyx than their progenitor line (Pro-5).[18] We found that boronation of RNase A increased
its cellular uptake by 4–5-fold (Figure 4). This enhancement was eliminated by fructose. Cell-surface sialic
acid content did not affect uptake significantly, consistent with
the modest (1.5-fold) increase in the Ka value for benzoxaborole with sialic acid versus glucose (Table 1). Confocal microscopy of the boronated protein
revealed punctate staining (Figure 4 inset),
which is consistent with uptake by endocytosis following complexation
with cell-surface saccharides.
Figure 4
Internalization of unmodified and boronated
RNase A into Pro-5
and Lec-2 cells in the absence or presence of fructose (0.25 M). Flow
cytometry data were normalized to the internalization of unmodified
RNase A into Pro-5 cells. Error bars represent SDs. Inset: Confocal
microscopy image of live Pro-5 cells incubated for 4 h with boronated
RNase A (5 μM) that had been labeled covalently with a green
fluorophore. Nuclei were stained blue with Hoechst 33322 (2 μg/mL).
Scale bar: 10 μm.
Internalization of unmodified and boronated
RNase A into Pro-5
and Lec-2 cells in the absence or presence of fructose (0.25 M). Flow
cytometry data were normalized to the internalization of unmodified
RNase A into Pro-5 cells. Error bars represent SDs. Inset: Confocal
microscopy image of live Pro-5 cells incubated for 4 h with boronated
RNase A (5 μM) that had been labeled covalently with a green
fluorophore. Nuclei were stained blue with Hoechst 33322 (2 μg/mL).
Scale bar: 10 μm.Although flow cytometry can quantify protein internalization
into
a cell, it does not differentiate between proteins in endosomes versus
those in the cytosol. Delivery into the cytosol is essential for the
efficacy of numerous putative chemotherapeutic agents. Boronated RNase
A retained 17% of its ribonucleolytic activity.[19] Accordingly, boronated RNase A has the potential to be
cytotoxic if it can gain entry to the cytosol. We found that boronated
RNase A inhibited the proliferation of humanerythroleukemia cells
(Figure 5). The addition of fructose diminished
the cytotoxic activity, presumably by decreasing the overall internalization.
Chemically inactivated boronated RNase A was much less cytotoxic,
indicating that the ribonucleolytic activity induced toxicity, not
the pendant boronates. We conclude that boronation not only facilitates
cellular uptake of a protein but also enhances its delivery to the
cytosol.
Figure 5
Inhibition of K-562 cell proliferation by unmodified and boronated
RNase A: (●) unmodified RNase A (IC50 >50 μM);
(◆) boronated RNase A (IC50 4.1 ± 0.4 μM);
(◇) boronated RNase A in the presence of fructose (50 mM) (IC50 9 ± 1 μM); (□) boronated RNase A alkylated
with 2-bromoacetate (IC50 >50 μM). The proliferation
of K-562 cells was measured by the incorporation of [methyl-3H]thymidine. Each data point represents the mean ±
standard error of the mean for three separate experiments performed
in triplicate.
Inhibition of K-562 cell proliferation by unmodified and boronated
RNase A: (●) unmodified RNase A (IC50 >50 μM);
(◆) boronated RNase A (IC50 4.1 ± 0.4 μM);
(◇) boronated RNase A in the presence of fructose (50 mM) (IC50 9 ± 1 μM); (□) boronated RNase A alkylated
with 2-bromoacetate (IC50 >50 μM). The proliferation
of K-562 cells was measured by the incorporation of [methyl-3H]thymidine. Each data point represents the mean ±
standard error of the mean for three separate experiments performed
in triplicate.Boronates have attributes that make them attractive
as mediators
of drug delivery. First, endosomes become more acidic as they mature.
In synergy, the affinity of boronates for saccharides decreases with
decreasing pH.[13a] Moreover, the ensuing
loss of complexation causes boronates to become more hydrophobic.[20] These attributes could facilitate translocation
to the cytosol. Second, boronates are not cationic,[21] averting the nonspecific Coulombic interactions elicited
by cationic domains,[2] which can lead to
high rates of glomerular filtration and opsonization in vivo.[22] Finally, we note that numerous diseases are
associated with changes in cell-surface glycosylation,[12,23] and we anticipate that boronic acids with specificity for particular
glycans could serve as the basis for targeted delivery strategies.[24]
Authors: Julie I Jay; Bonnie E Lai; David G Myszka; Alamelu Mahalingam; Kris Langheinrich; David F Katz; Patrick F Kiser Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Kingshuk Dutta; Ding Hu; Bo Zhao; Alexander E Ribbe; Jiaming Zhuang; S Thayumanavan Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Sean K Liew; Aleksandra Holownia; Diego B Diaz; Philip A Cistrone; Philip E Dawson; Andrei K Yudin Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Jiawang Liu; Shilong Zheng; Victoria L Akerstrom; Chester Yuan; Youning Ma; Qiu Zhong; Changde Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Shanchun Guo; Peng Ma; Elena V Skripnikova; Melyssa R Bratton; Antonio Pannuti; Lucio Miele; Thomas E Wiese; Guangdi Wang Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 7.446