Literature DB >> 7896110

The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

P D Keightley1.   

Abstract

Parameters of continuous distributions of effects and rates of spontaneous mutation for relative viability in Drosophila are estimated by maximum likelihood from data of two published experiments on accumulation of mutations on protected second chromosomes. A model of equal mutant effects gives a poor fit to the data of the two experiments; higher likelihoods are obtained with leptokurtic distributions or for models in which there is more than one class of mutation effect. Minimum estimates of mutation rates (events per generation) at polygenes affecting viability on chromosome 2 are 0.14 and 0.068, but estimates are strongly confounded with other parameters in the model. Separate information on rates of molecular divergence between Drosophila species and from rates of movement of transposable elements is used to infer the overall genomic mutation rate in Drosophila, and the viability data are analyzed with mutation rate as a known parameter. If, for example, a mutation rate for chromosome 2 of 0.4 is assumed, maximum likelihood estimates of mean mutant effect on relative viability are 0.4% and 1%, but the majority of mutations have very much smaller effects than these values as distributions are highly leptokurtic. The methodology is applied to estimate viability effects of single P element insertional mutations. The mean effect per insertion is found to be higher, and their distribution is found to be less leptokurtic than for spontaneous mutations. The equilibrium genetic variance of viability predicted by a mutation-selection balance model with parameters estimated from the mutation accumulation experiments is similar to laboratory estimates of genetic variance of viability from natural populations of Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7896110      PMCID: PMC1206267     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  16 in total

1.  Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY.

Authors:  T MUKAI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T F Mackay; R F Lyman; M S Jackson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  P-M hybrid dysgenesis does not mobilize other transposable element families in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  W B Eggleston; D M Johnson-Schlitz; W R Engels
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Hybrid Dysgenesis in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: A Syndrome of Aberrant Traits Including Mutation, Sterility and Male Recombination.

Authors:  M G Kidwell; J F Kidwell; J A Sved
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Fitness of third chromosome homozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Rates of DNA change and phylogeny from the DNA sequences of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene for five closely related species of Hawaiian Drosophila.

Authors:  R G Rowan; J A Hunt
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  90 in total

1.  Sex and adaptation in a changing environment.

Authors:  D Waxman; J R Peck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Effect of selection against deleterious mutations on the decline in heterozygosity at neutral loci in closely inbreeding populations.

Authors:  J Wang; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait.

Authors:  S P Otto; C D Jones
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Pleiotropic model of maintenance of quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Patterns of inbreeding depression and architecture of the load in subdivided populations.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin; Joëlle Ronfort; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Segregation and the evolution of sex under overdominant selection.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Comparing analysis methods for mutation-accumulation data: a simulation study.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado; Araceli Gallego
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Sex slows down the accumulation of deleterious mutations in the homothallic fungus Aspergillus nidulans.

Authors:  Judith Bruggeman; Alfons J M Debets; Pieter J Wijngaarden; J Arjan G M deVisser; Rolf F Hoekstra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus.

Authors:  Rafael Sanjuán; Andrés Moya; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.