Literature DB >> 9752626

The scope for the involvement of patients in their consultations with health professionals: rights, responsibilities and preferences of patients.

S Buetow1.   

Abstract

The degree and nature of patient involvement in consultations with health professionals influences problem and needs recognition and management, and public accountability. This paper suggests a framework for understanding the scope for patient involvement in such consultations. Patients are defined as co-producers of formal health services, whose potential for involvement in consultations depends on their personal rights, responsibilities and preferences. Patients' rights in consultations are poorly defined and, in the National Health Service (NHS), not legally enforceable. The responsibilities of patients are also undefined. I suggest that these are not to deny, of their own volition, the rights of others, which in consultations necessitate mutuality of involvement through information-exchange and shared decision-making. Preferences should be met insofar as they do not militate against responsibilities and rights.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; National Health Service; Patient's Charter (Great Britain); Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9752626      PMCID: PMC1377673          DOI: 10.1136/jme.24.4.243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  28 in total

1.  Patients' involvement in medical audit in general practice.

Authors:  John Newton
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  1996-05

2.  Patient-centredness in the consultation. 2: Does it really make a difference?

Authors:  R J Henbest; M Stewart
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Searching for moral certainty in medicine: a proposal for a new model of the doctor-patient encounter.

Authors:  M Siegler
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb

4.  The patient's role in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  D S Brody
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Patients' wants versus patients' interests.

Authors:  J Wilson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors.

Authors:  A E Beisecker; T D Beisecker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Partnerships in patient care: a contractual approach.

Authors:  T E Quill
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?

Authors:  W M Strull; B Lo; G Charles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Consensual norms regarding patient involvement.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  What is a successful doctor-patient interview? A study of interactions and outcomes.

Authors:  M A Stewart
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Are patients morally responsible for their errors?

Authors:  S Buetow; G Elwyn
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  High need patients receiving targeted entitlements: what responsibilities do they have in primary health care?

Authors:  S Buetow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Towards a new understanding of provider continuity.

Authors:  Stephen A Buetow
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Power issues in the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  F Goodyear-Smith; S Buetow
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2001

5.  Clinical ethics and patient advocacy: the power of communication in health care.

Authors:  Inken Annegret Emrich; Leyla Fröhlich-Güzelsoy; Florian Bruns; Bernd Friedrich; Andreas Frewer
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-06

6.  Do patients have duties?

Authors:  H M Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Premature consent and patient duties.

Authors:  Andrew P Rebera; Dimitris Dimitriou
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2021-05-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.