Literature DB >> 3583160

Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing.

P R Cavanagh, M M Rodgers, A Iiboshi.   

Abstract

The plantar pressure distributions for a large heterogeneous sample of feet (N = 107) were collected during barefoot standing using a capacitance mat. From these data, the function of the foot during standing was characterized. Peak pressures under the heel (139 kPa) were, on average, 2.6 times greater than forefoot pressures (53 kPa). Forefoot peak pressures were usually located under the second or third metatarsal heads. No significant relationship was found between body weight and the magnitude of peak pressure. The concepts of a transverse arch at the level of the metatarsal heads and a "tripod" theory of load distribution were not substantiated by this study. Load distribution analysis showed that the heel carried 60%, the midfoot 8%, and the forefoot 28% of the weightbearing load. The toes were only minimally involved in the weightbearing process. Examples of unusual distributions are shown; finally, a checklist is provided to aid the clinician in evaluating plantar pressure findings.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3583160     DOI: 10.1177/107110078700700502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle        ISSN: 0198-0211


  30 in total

1.  A densitometric analysis of the human first metatarsal bone.

Authors:  C Muehleman; D Bareither; B L Manion
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Spatial relationships between shearing stresses and pressure on the plantar skin surface during gait.

Authors:  Samantha Stucke; Daniel McFarland; Larry Goss; Sergey Fonov; Grant R McMillan; Amy Tucker; Necip Berme; Hasan Cenk Guler; Chris Bigelow; Brian L Davis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Age-related changes in speed and accuracy during rapid targeted center of pressure movements near the posterior limit of the base of support.

Authors:  Manuel E Hernandez; James A Ashton-Miller; Neil B Alexander
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Pedobarographic analysis following Ponseti treatment for congenital clubfoot.

Authors:  Marc F Sinclair; Kerstin Bosch; Dieter Rosenbaum; Stephanie Böhm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Intraoperative pedography].

Authors:  Martinus Richter; Stefan Zech
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  In Vivo Plantar Pressures in Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Compared to Control Using an Intraoperative Pedobarographic Device.

Authors:  Aoife MacMahon; Howard J Hillstrom; Huong T Do; Jeremy Y Chan; Jonathan T Deland; Scott J Ellis
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-02-28

7.  [Forefoot relief with shoe inserts : Effects of different construction strategies].

Authors:  H Baur; N Merz; A Muster; G Flückiger; A Hirschmüller
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Diabetic feet at risk: a new method of analysis of walking foot pressure images at different levels of neuropathy for early detection of plantar ulcers.

Authors:  K G Prabhu; K M Patil; S Srinivasan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 9.  Midfoot arthritis- current concepts review.

Authors:  Harish Kurup; Nijil Vasukutty
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-03-08

10.  Correlation between two-point discrimination with other measures of sensory loss in diabetes mellitus patients.

Authors:  R Periyasamy; M Manivannan; V B Narayanamurthy
Journal:  Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries       Date:  2008-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.