Literature DB >> 15737261

Efficacy of plantar loading parameters during gait in terms of reliability, variability, effect of gender and relationship between contact area and plantar pressure.

Darlene F Murphy1, Bruce D Beynnon, James D Michelson, Pamela M Vacek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine plantar pressure and contact areas of the foot inside the athletic shoe during activity. The objectives were to determine if plantar pressure and contact area measurements collected on multiple trials from the same subject were reliable, to determine the variability of measurements between subjects as compared to that found between steps within a single subject, to determine the relationship between contact area and plantar pressure, and to ascertain whether there were any systematic gender differences in these measurements.
METHODS: Sixteen healthy adults volunteered for participation in the first part of the study that was designed to determine reliability and variability of the testing methodology. A separate group of fifty healthy high school and collegiate athletes participating in soccer, field hockey, basketball, and lacrosse comprised the second part of the study that was designed to investigate gender differences in terms of normalized midfoot plantar pressure and contact area, and the interrelationship between the two measurements. Data were collected during the midstance phase of gait, using the Pedar in-shoe measurement system (Novel GMBH, St. Paul, MN). Athletes wore their own athletic shoes and performed walking trials on a surface similar to that used in their sport. The foot was divided into four regions based on radiographic measurements.
RESULTS: The midfoot region demonstrated excellent reliability across multiple trials of the same subject in contact area and plantar pressure, and the variability between steps within a single subject was small when compared to that between subjects. Normalized midfoot contact area and plantar pressure values were highly correlated with r values of 0.862 on the left foot and .912 on the right foot. No significant differences were found in normalized midfoot contact area or plantar pressure values between males and females.
CONCLUSIONS: The Pedar in-shoe pressure measurement system can be used reliably to quantify contact area and plantar pressure beneath the midfoot region during the midstance phase of gait. This measurement technique can now be used in risk factor studies designed to identify individuals at risk for injury to the foot, ankle, and other lower extremity structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15737261     DOI: 10.1177/107110070502600210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  26 in total

1.  The accuracy of an automasking algorithm in plantar pressure measurements.

Authors:  Scott J Ellis; Hill Stoecklein; Joseph C Yu; Grisha Syrkin; Howard Hillstrom; Jonathan T Deland
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-11-30

2.  Reliability of the TekScan MatScan(R) system for the measurement of plantar forces and pressures during barefoot level walking in healthy adults.

Authors:  Gerard V Zammit; Hylton B Menz; Shannon E Munteanu
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Factors affecting center of pressure in older adults: the Framingham Foot Study.

Authors:  Thomas J Hagedorn; Alyssa B Dufour; Yvonne M Golightly; Jody L Riskowski; Howard J Hillstrom; Virginia A Casey; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Reduction of peak plantar pressure in people with diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy: an evaluation of the DH Pressure Relief Shoe™.

Authors:  Anita Raspovic; Karl B Landorf; Jana Gazarek; Megan Stark
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Test-retest reliability of an insole plantar pressure system to assess gait along linear and curved trajectories.

Authors:  Marco Godi; Anna Maria Turcato; Marco Schieppati; Antonio Nardone
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  The effect of customised and sham foot orthoses on plantar pressures.

Authors:  Chris J McCormick; Daniel R Bonanno; Karl B Landorf
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  The effect of different depths of medial heel skive on plantar pressures.

Authors:  Daniel R Bonanno; Cheryl Y Zhang; Rose C Farrugia; Matthew G Bull; Anita M Raspovic; Adam R Bird; Karl B Landorf
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  The effect of removing plugs and adding arch support to foam based insoles on plantar pressures in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Tung-Liang Lin; Huey-Min Sheen; Chin-Teng Chung; Sai-Wei Yang; Shih-Yi Lin; Hong-Ji Luo; Chung-Yu Chen; I-Cheng Chan; Hsu-Sheng Shih; Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Accuracy and repeatability of the gait analysis by the WalkinSense system.

Authors:  Marcelo P de Castro; Marco Meucci; Denise P Soares; Pedro Fonseca; Márcio Borgonovo-Santos; Filipa Sousa; Leandro Machado; João Paulo Vilas-Boas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Rocker-sole footwear versus prefabricated foot orthoses for the treatment of pain associated with first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomised trial.

Authors:  Hylton B Menz; Pazit Levinger; Jade M Tan; Maria Auhl; Edward Roddy; Shannon E Munteanu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.