Literature DB >> 22293780

The incidence of C5 palsy after multilevel cervical decompression procedures: a review of 750 consecutive cases.

Ahmad Nassr1, Jason C Eck, Ravi K Ponnappan, Rami R Zanoun, William F Donaldson, James D Kang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of 750 consecutive multilevel cervical spine decompression surgeries performed by a single spine surgeon.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of C5 palsy in a large consecutive series of multilevel cervical spine decompression procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Palsy of the C5 nerve is a well-known potential complication of cervical spine surgery with reported rates ranging from 0% to 30%. The etiology remains uncertain but has been attributed to iatrogenic injury during surgery, tethering from shifting of the spinal cord, spinal cord ischemia, and reperfusion injury of the spinal cord.
METHODS: We included patients undergoing multilevel cervical corpectomy, corpectomy with posterior fusion, posterior laminectomy and fusion, and laminoplasty. Exclusion criteria included lack of follow-up data, spinal cord injury preventing preoperative or postoperative motor testing, or surgery not involving the C5 level. Incidence of C5 palsy was determined and compared to determine whether significant differences existed among the various procedures, patient age, sex, revision surgery, preoperative weakness, diabetes, smoking, number of levels decompressed, and history of previous upper extremity surgery.
RESULTS: Of the 750 patients, 120 were eliminated on the basis of the exclusion criteria. The 630 patients included in the analysis consisted of 292 females and 338 males. The mean age was 58 years (range, 19-87). The incidence of C5 nerve palsy for the entire group was 42 of 630 (6.7%). The incidence was highest for the laminectomy and fusion group (9.5%), followed by the corpectomy with posterior fusion group (8.4%), the corpectomy group (5.1%), and finally the laminoplasty group (4.8%), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. There was a significantly higher incidence in males (8.6% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Incidence of C5 nerve palsy after cervical spine decompression was 6.7%. This is consistent with previously published studies and represents the largest series of North American patients to date. There is no statistically significant difference in incidence of C5 palsy based on surgical procedure, although there was a trend toward higher rates with laminectomy and fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22293780     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219cfe9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  42 in total

1.  Prediction of the risk of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion with cervical myelopathy using a support vector machine: an analysis of 184 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Haosheng Wang; Zhi-Ri Tang; Wenle Li; Tingting Fan; Jianwu Zhao; Mingyang Kang; Rongpeng Dong; Yang Qu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Factors associated with postoperative C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty: retrospective cohort study using multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuji; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Ken Ishii; Nobuyuki Fujita; Kazuhiro Chiba; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Analysis of correlative risk factors for C5 palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Haiying Wang; Xu Zhang; Bing Lv; Wenyuan Ding; Yong Shen; Dalong Yang; Zhilong Bai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

4.  Predictors of morbidity and mortality among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically.

Authors:  I David Kaye; Bryan J Marascalchi; Angel E Macagno; Virginie A Lafage; John A Bendo; Peter G Passias
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Unilateral laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fixation for less invasive decompression of the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  Gregor Schmeiser; C Schilling; T M Grupp; L Papavero; K Püschel; R Kothe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel J Blizzard; Adam M Caputo; Charles Z Sheets; Mitchell R Klement; Keith W Michael; Robert E Isaacs; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  C5 palsy after insertion of a winged expandable cervical cage: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nigro; Roberto Tarantino; Pasquale Donnarumma; Antonio Santoro; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

8.  Prevalence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical decompressive surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fenyong Shou; Zhe Li; Huan Wang; Chongnan Yan; Qi Liu; Chi Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Clinical analysis of C5 palsy after cervical decompression surgery: relationship between recovery duration and clinical and radiological factors.

Authors:  Chae-Hong Lim; Sung-Woo Roh; Seung-Chul Rhim; Sang-Ryong Jeon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  C5 nerve root palsy following decompression of cervical spine with anterior versus posterior types of procedures in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Recep Basaran; Tuncay Kaner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.