Haosheng Wang1, Zhi-Ri Tang2, Wenle Li3,4, Tingting Fan5, Jianwu Zhao1, Mingyang Kang1, Rongpeng Dong1, Yang Qu6. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China. 2. School of Microelectronics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China. 3. Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, 530000, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Spinal Surgery, Liuzhou People's Hospital, Liuzhou, 545000, People's Republic of China. 5. Department of Endocrinology, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China. 6. Department of Orthopedics, Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Street, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China. quy@jlu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to predict C5 palsy (C5P) after posterior laminectomy and fusion (PLF) with cervical myelopathy (CM) from routinely available variables using a support vector machine (SVM) method. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective investigation based on 184 consecutive patients with CM after PLF, and data were collected from March 2013 to December 2019. Clinical and imaging variables were obtained and imported into univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify risk factors for C5P. According to published reports and clinical experience, a series of variables was selected to develop an SVM machine learning model to predict C5P. The accuracy (ACC), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and confusion matrices were used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model. RESULTS: Among the 184 consecutive patients, C5P occurred in 26 patients (14.13%). Multivariate analyses demonstrated the following 4 independent factors associated with C5P: abnormal electromyogram (odds ratio [OR] = 7.861), JOA recovery rate (OR = 1.412), modified Pavlov ratio (OR = 0.009), and presence of C4-C5 foraminal stenosis (OR = 15.492). The SVM model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.923 and an ACC of 0.918. Additionally, the confusion matrix showed the classification results of the discriminant analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The designed SVM model presented satisfactory performance in predicting C5P from routinely available variables. However, future external validation is needed.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to predict C5 palsy (C5P) after posterior laminectomy and fusion (PLF) with cervical myelopathy (CM) from routinely available variables using a support vector machine (SVM) method. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective investigation based on 184 consecutive patients with CM after PLF, and data were collected from March 2013 to December 2019. Clinical and imaging variables were obtained and imported into univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify risk factors for C5P. According to published reports and clinical experience, a series of variables was selected to develop an SVM machine learning model to predict C5P. The accuracy (ACC), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and confusion matrices were used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model. RESULTS: Among the 184 consecutive patients, C5P occurred in 26 patients (14.13%). Multivariate analyses demonstrated the following 4 independent factors associated with C5P: abnormal electromyogram (odds ratio [OR] = 7.861), JOA recovery rate (OR = 1.412), modified Pavlov ratio (OR = 0.009), and presence of C4-C5 foraminal stenosis (OR = 15.492). The SVM model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.923 and an ACC of 0.918. Additionally, the confusion matrix showed the classification results of the discriminant analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The designed SVM model presented satisfactory performance in predicting C5P from routinely available variables. However, future external validation is needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
C5 palsy; Cervical myelopathy; Outcomes; Posterior laminectomy and fusion; Risk factors; Support vector machine
Authors: Scott C Wagner; Arjun S Sebastian; Joseph S Butler; Ian D Kaye; Patrick B Morrissey; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Christopher K Kepler Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Mohamad Bydon; Mohamed Macki; Paul Kaloostian; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Allan J Belzberg; Ali Bydon; Timothy F Witham Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Dapeng Fan; Daniel M Schwartz; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Ahmad Nassr; Jason C Eck; Ravi K Ponnappan; Rami R Zanoun; William F Donaldson; James D Kang Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Babak Saravi; Frank Hassel; Sara Ülkümen; Alisia Zink; Veronika Shavlokhova; Sebastien Couillard-Despres; Martin Boeker; Peter Obid; Gernot Michael Lang Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-03-22