Literature DB >> 26002352

Predictors of morbidity and mortality among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically.

I David Kaye1, Bryan J Marascalchi2, Angel E Macagno2, Virginie A Lafage2, John A Bendo2, Peter G Passias2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to report and quantify the associated factors for morbidity and mortality following surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was use to retrospectively review all patients over 25 years of age with a diagnosis of CSM who underwent anterior and/or posterior cervical fusion or laminoplasty between 2001 and 2010. The main outcome measures were total procedure-related complications and mortality. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify demographic, comorbidity, and surgical parameters associated with increased morbidity and mortality risk [reported as: OR (95% CI)].
RESULTS: A total of 54,348 patients underwent surgical intervention for CSM with an overall morbidity rate of 9.83% and mortality rate of 0.43%. Comorbidities found to be associated with an increased complication rate included: pulmonary circulation disorders [6.92 (5.91-8.12)], pathologic weight loss [3.42 (3.00-3.90)], and electrolyte imbalance [2.82 (2.65-3.01)]. Comorbidities found to be associated with an increased mortality rate included: congestive heart failure [4.59 (3.62-5.82)], pulmonary circulation disorders [11.29 (8.24-15.47)], and pathologic weight loss [5.43 (4.07-7.26)]. Alternatively, hypertension [0.56 (0.46-0.67)] and obesity [0.36 (0.22-0.61)] were found to confer a decreased risk of mortality. Increased morbidity and mortality rates were also identified for fusions of 4-8 levels [morbidity: 1.55 (1.48-1.62), mortality: 1.80 (1.48-2.18)] and for age >65 years [morbidity: 1.65 (1.57-1.72), mortality: 2.74 (2.25-3.34)]. An increased morbidity rate was found for posterior-only [1.55 (1.47-1.63)] and combined anterior and posterior fusions [3.20 (2.98-3.43)], and an increased mortality rate was identified for posterior-only fusions [1.87 (1.40-2.49)]. Although revision fusions were associated with an increased morbidity rate [1.81 (1.64-2.00)], they were associated with a decreased rate of mortality [0.24 (0.10-0.59)].
CONCLUSION: The NIS database was used to provide national estimates of morbidity and mortality following surgical management of CSM in the United States. Several comorbidities, as well as demographic and surgical parameters, were identified as associated factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Morbidity; Mortality; NIS database

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26002352     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4010-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zdenek Kadanka; Miroslav Mares; Josef Bednaník; Vladimír Smrcka; Martin Krbec; Lubor Stejskal; Richard Chaloupka; Dagmar Surelová; Oldrich Novotný; Igor Urbánek; Ladislav Dusek
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Min Qi; Huajiang Chen; Lili Yang; Xinwei Wang; Guodong Shi; Rui Gao; Ce Wang; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Functional and clinical outcomes following surgical treatment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of 81 cases.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Ahilan Kailaya-Vasan; Eric M Massicotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-01-14

4.  Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States.

Authors:  Marjorie C Wang; Leighton Chan; Dennis J Maiman; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Charles C Edwards; John G Heller; Hideki Murakami
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Justin S Smith; Branko Kopjar; Paul M Arnold; S Tim Yoon; Alexander R Vaccaro; Darrel S Brodke; Michael E Janssen; Jens R Chapman; Rick C Sasso; Eric J Woodard; Robert J Banco; Eric M Massicotte; Mark B Dekutoski; Ziya L Gokaslan; Christopher M Bono; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-02-10

7.  A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multi-center AOSpine North America study.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Branko Kopjar; Alexander Vaccaro; Sangwook Tim Yoon; Paul M Arnold; Eric M Massicotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Clinical prognostic indicators of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Langston T Holly; Paul G Matz; Paul A Anderson; Michael W Groff; Robert F Heary; Michael G Kaiser; Praveen V Mummaneni; Timothy C Ryken; Tanvir F Choudhri; Edward J Vresilovic; Daniel K Resnick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-08

9.  Surgical management of cervical degenerative disease: the evidence related to indications, impact, and outcome.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Babak Arvin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-08

10.  Suspended laminoplasty for wide posterior cervical decompression and intradural access: results, advantages, and complications.

Authors:  Steven Casha; H Andries Engelbrecht; Stephan J DuPlessis; R John Hurlbert
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-07
View more
  10 in total

1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European spine journal, 2015.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Impact of old age on patient-report outcomes and cost utility for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for degenerative spine disease.

Authors:  Silky Chotai; Scott L Parker; J Alex Sielatycki; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Harrison F Kay; Joseph B Wick; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Surgical site infections following operative management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prevalence, predictors of occurence, and influence on peri-operative outcomes.

Authors:  C M Jalai; N Worley; G W Poorman; D L Cruz; S Vira; P G Passias
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel J Blizzard; Adam M Caputo; Charles Z Sheets; Mitchell R Klement; Keith W Michael; Robert E Isaacs; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A cohort study of the morbidity of combined anterior-posterior cervical spinal fusions: incidence and predictors of postoperative dysphagia.

Authors:  Kevin A Reinard; Diana M Cook; Hesham M Zakaria; Azam M Basheer; Victor W Chang; Muwaffak M Abdulhak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Nathan J Lee; Jun S Kim; Paul Park; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-12-30

7.  Socioeconomic and regional differences in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Sheri K Palejwala; Anand I Rughani; G Michael Lemole; Travis M Dumont
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-05-26

8.  Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Fan Jiang; Jamie R F Wilson; Jetan H Badhiwala; Carlo Santaguida; Michael H Weber; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06

Review 9.  The Role of Nutrition in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Celine I Partha Sarathi; Oliver D Mowforth; Amil Sinha; Faheem Bhatti; Aniqah Bhatti; Melika Akhbari; Shahzaib Ahmed; Benjamin M Davies
Journal:  Nutr Metab Insights       Date:  2021-10-30

10.  The influence of sagittal profile alteration and final lordosis on the clinical outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A Delta-Omega-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Koeppen; Claudia Piepenbrock; Stefan Kroppenstedt; Mario Čabraja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.