Literature DB >> 2229373

Clinical comparison of isolator and BACTEC 660 resin media for blood culture.

M T Kelly1, F J Roberts, D Henry, I Geere, J A Smith.   

Abstract

The 10-ml Isolator system (E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.) was compared with the BACTEC 16A-17A nonradiometric resin system (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Towson, Md.) for isolation of organisms from 6,839 paired blood cultures. Equal volumes of blood (6 to 10 ml for each Isolator and 3 to 5 ml for each BACTEC bottle) were cultured in parallel in the two systems, and 600 isolates that were judged to be clinically significant by chart review were recovered during the study. The BACTEC resin system detected 510 (85%) and the Isolator system detected 435 (72%) of the clinically significant isolates (P less than 0.001). Of 45 polymicrobial blood cultures, the BACTEC system detected 32 (71%) and the Isolator system detected 21 (47%) (P less than 0.05). Of 253 gram-negative bacilli isolated during the study, 30% were detected only in the BACTEC system and 16% were detected only in the Isolator system (P less than 0.001), and of 56 nonfermentative or fastidious gram-negative bacilli detected, 46% were recovered only in the BACTEC system, while 14% were detected only in the Isolator system (P less than 0.001). Of 86 streptococci isolated during the study, 30% were detected only in the BACTEC system, and 4% were detected only in the Isolator system (P less than 0.001). Recoveries of anaerobic bacteria, staphylococci, and yeasts were equivalent in the two systems. Organisms judged to be contaminants were detected in approximately 1% of the cultures in each system. The results suggest that use of resin media renders the BACTEC nonradiometric system equivalent or superior to the Isolator system for detection of clinically significant organisms in blood cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2229373      PMCID: PMC268079          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1925-1927.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  4 in total

1.  Routine evaluation of BACTEC NR-16A and NR-17A media.

Authors:  R J Courcol; A V Durocher; M Roussel-Delvallez; A Fruchart; G R Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical comparison of lysis-centrifugation and radiometric resin systems for blood culture.

Authors:  P Brannon; T E Kiehn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Clinical evaluation of a lysis-centrifugation technique for the detection of septicemia.

Authors:  M T Kelly; M F Fojtasek; T M Abbott; D C Hale; J R Dizikes; R Boshard; G E Buck; W J Martin; J M Matsen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Clinical laboratory comparison of the 10-ml isolator blood culture system with BACTEC radiometric blood culture media.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J P Manzella; J H McConville
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  Performance of five agar media for recovery of fungi from isolator blood cultures.

Authors:  G W Procop; F R Cockerill; E A Vetter; W S Harmsen; J G Hughes; G D Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Early detection and identification of commonly encountered Candida species from simulated blood cultures by using a real-time PCR-based assay.

Authors:  Younes Maaroufi; Jean-Marc De Bruyne; Valérie Duchateau; Aspasia Georgala; Françoise Crokaert
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 3.  Polymerase chain reaction-based assays for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections.

Authors:  Themistoklis K Kourkoumpetis; Beth Burgwyn Fuchs; Jeffrey J Coleman; Athanasios Desalermos; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Performance of a new combination of blood culture vials in sepsis detection: a 2-year retrospective comparison.

Authors:  Paolo Bottino; Fabio Rapallo; Elisa Gamalero; Andrea Rocchetti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Advantage of combining resin with lytic BACTEC blood culture media.

Authors:  P Rohner; B Pepey; R Auckenthaler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical importance of increased sensitivity of BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  L C McDonald; J Fune; L B Gaido; M P Weinstein; L G Reimer; T M Flynn; M L Wilson; S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Factors affecting detection of Brucella melitensis by BACTEC NR730, a nonradiometric system for hemocultures.

Authors:  C Gamazo; A I Vitas; I López-Goñi; R Díaz; I Moriyón
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Clinical comparison of the resin-containing BACTEC 26 Plus and the Isolator 10 blood culturing systems.

Authors:  J J Tarrand; C Guillot; M Wenglar; J Jackson; J D Lajeunesse; K V Rolston
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia.

Authors:  M L Wilson; T E Davis; S Mirrett; J Reynolds; D Fuller; S D Allen; K K Flint; F Koontz; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Controlled clinical evaluation of BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and BacT/Alert Aerobic FAN bottles for detection of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  J K Pohlman; B A Kirkley; K A Easley; B A Basille; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.