Literature DB >> 31065826

Performance of a new combination of blood culture vials in sepsis detection: a 2-year retrospective comparison.

Paolo Bottino1, Fabio Rapallo2, Elisa Gamalero2, Andrea Rocchetti3.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of bloodstream infection requires the optimum combination of media in an automated blood culture system for maximum recovery of pathogens with the earliest time to detection. In a previous work, we showed that for patients admitted to the Emergency Department of our hospital, the combination of BACTEC lytic anaerobic and BACTEC aerobic vials was more efficient than BACTEC anaerobic and BACTEC aerobic vial. In this study, we extended the work including a broader patient population, representative of all hospital. A total of 8629 cultures were collected during the pre-lytic phase, from 01 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 and 7940 cultures during the post-lytic phase, ranged from 01 July 2015 to 30 June 2016. The number of positive blood cultures was higher during the post-lytic phase (19.74%) than in the pre-lytic phase (17.52%), particularly for Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and anaerobes. We also observed a significant decreased of the time to detection, with the mean and median in the post-lytic phase of 17.68 and 13.05 h compared with 19.49 and 14.47 h in the pre-lytic phase. Whereas the time to detection was the same for organisms recovered in the aerobic Plus bottles for both time periods, time to detection for the anaerobic lytic bottles was significantly faster than with the anaerobic Plus bottles. This study carried out on a long time observation reported that a simple modification of composition of blood culture set could lead to better results in bloodstream infection detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic; Anaerobic; BACTEC; Blood culture; Lytic; Time to detection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31065826     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03568-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  23 in total

Review 1.  Blood cultures: clinical aspects and controversies.

Authors:  J M Mylotte; A Tayara
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress.

Authors:  Melvin P Weinstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Sepsis: a roadmap for future research.

Authors:  Jonathan Cohen; Jean-Louis Vincent; Neill K J Adhikari; Flavia R Machado; Derek C Angus; Thierry Calandra; Katia Jaton; Stefano Giulieri; Julie Delaloye; Steven Opal; Kevin Tracey; Tom van der Poll; Eric Pelfrene
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 4.  Blood culture technique: current controversies.

Authors:  D C Shanson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Clinical comparison of isolator and BACTEC 660 resin media for blood culture.

Authors:  M T Kelly; F J Roberts; D Henry; I Geere; J A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical comparison of the resin-containing BACTEC 26 Plus and the Isolator 10 blood culturing systems.

Authors:  J J Tarrand; C Guillot; M Wenglar; J Jackson; J D Lajeunesse; K V Rolston
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Performance of two resin-containing blood culture media in detection of bloodstream infections and in direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) broth assays for isolate identification: clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert Plus and Bactec Plus systems.

Authors:  Barbara Fiori; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Viviana Di Florio; Flavio De Maio; Giulia De Angelis; Alessia Giaquinto; Lara Campana; Eloisa Tanzarella; Mario Tumbarello; Massimo Antonelli; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Teresa Spanu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Clinical evaluation of BacT/Alert FA plus and FN plus bottles compared with standard bottles.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Seong Chun Kim; In-Gyu Bae; Eun-Ha Koh; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Initial emergency department diagnosis and management of adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Sarah M Perman; Munish Goyal; David F Gaieski
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  The Performance of the Four Anaerobic Blood Culture Bottles BacT/ALERT-FN, -FN Plus, BACTEC-Plus and -Lytic in Detection of Anaerobic Bacteria and Identification by Direct MALDI-TOF MS.

Authors:  Mohammed Almuhayawi; Osman Altun; Adam Dilshad Abdulmajeed; Måns Ullberg; Volkan Özenci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.