Literature DB >> 22287207

Similarity and number of alternatives in the random-dot motion paradigm.

Leendert van Maanen1, Raoul P P P Grasman, Birte U Forstmann, Max C Keuken, Scott D Brown, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers.   

Abstract

The popular random-dot motion (RDM) task has recently been applied to multiple-choice perceptual decision-making. However, changes in the number of alternatives on an RDM display lead to changes in the similarity between the alternatives, complicating the study of multiple-choice effects. To disentangle the effects of similarity and number of alternatives, we analyzed behavior in the RDM task using an optimal-observer model. The model applies Bayesian principles to give an account of how changes in the stimulus influence the decision-making process. A possible neural implementation of the optimal-observer model is discussed, and we provide behavioral data that support the model. We verify the predictions from the optimal-observer model by fitting a descriptive model of choice behavior (the linear ballistic accumulator model) to the behavioral data. The results show that (a) there is a natural interaction in the RDM task between similarity and the number of alternatives; (b) the number of alternatives influences “response caution”, whereas the similarity between the alternatives influences “drift rate”; and (c) decisions in the RDM task are near optimal when participants are presented with multiple alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22287207      PMCID: PMC3310993          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0267-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  24 in total

Review 1.  Banburismus and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.

Authors:  Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  Laws of visual choice reaction time.

Authors:  W H Teichner; M J Krebs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination.

Authors:  K Ball; R Sekuler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Orientation tuning curves: empirical description and estimation of parameters.

Authors:  N V Swindale
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: empirical tests of theoretical predictions.

Authors:  Patrick Simen; David Contreras; Cara Buck; Peter Hu; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Domain general mechanisms of perceptual decision making in human cortex.

Authors:  Tiffany C Ho; Scott Brown; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Elapsed decision time affects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task.

Authors:  Timothy D Hanks; Mark E Mazurek; Roozbeh Kiani; Elisabeth Hopp; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  10 in total

1.  Lesions to the left lateral prefrontal cortex impair decision threshold adjustment for lexical selection.

Authors:  Royce Anders; Stéphanie Riès; Leendert Van Maanen; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Individual differences in sour and salt sensitivity: detection and quality recognition thresholds for citric acid and sodium chloride.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Evaluating the consequences of impaired monitoring of learned behavior in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using a Bayesian hierarchical model of choice response time.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Scott Brown
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Reaction time in ankle movements: a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Michmizos; Hermano Igo Krebs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A new framework for modeling decisions about changing information: The Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model.

Authors:  William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The subthalamic nucleus during decision-making with multiple alternatives.

Authors:  Max C Keuken; Leendert Van Maanen; Rafal Bogacz; Andreas Schäfer; Jane Neumann; Robert Turner; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The impact of MRI scanner environment on perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Birte U Forstmann; Max C Keuken; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-03

8.  Loss Aversion Reflects Information Accumulation, Not Bias: A Drift-Diffusion Model Study.

Authors:  Summer N Clay; John A Clithero; Alison M Harris; Catherine L Reed
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-10

9.  Degenerate boundaries for multiple-alternative decisions.

Authors:  Sophie-Anne Baker; Thom Griffith; Nathan F Lepora
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 17.694

10.  The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task.

Authors:  Martijn J Mulder; Max C Keuken; Leendert van Maanen; Wouter Boekel; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.