Literature DB >> 9518026

Orientation tuning curves: empirical description and estimation of parameters.

N V Swindale1.   

Abstract

This paper compares the ability of some simple model functions to describe orientation tuning curves obtained in extracellular single-unit recordings from area 17 of the cat visual cortex. It also investigates the relationships between three methods currently used to estimate preferred orientation from tuning curve data: (a) least-squares curve fitting, (b) the vector sum method and (c) the Fourier transform method (Wörgötter and Eysel 1987). The results show that the best fitting model function for single-unit orientation tuning curves is a von Mises circular function with a variable degree of skewness. However, other functions, such as a wrapped Gaussian, fit the data nearly as well. A cosine function provides a poor description of tuning curves in almost all instances. It is demonstrated that the vector sum and Fourier methods of determining preferred orientation are equivalent, and identical to calculating a least-square fit of a cosine function to the data. Least-squares fitting of a better model function, such as a von Mises function or a wrapped Gaussian, is therefore likely to be a better method for estimating preferred orientation. Monte-Carlo simulations confirmed this, although for broad orientation tuning curves sampled at 45 degree intervals, as is typical in optical recording experiments, all the methods gave similarly accurate estimates of preferred orientation. The sampling interval, the estimated error in the response measurements and the probable shape of the underlying response function all need to be taken into account in deciding on the best method of estimating referred orientation from physiological measurements of orientation tuning data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9518026     DOI: 10.1007/s004220050411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  103 in total

1.  Orientation selectivity in macaque V1: diversity and laminar dependence.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach; Robert M Shapley; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Correlation of local and global orientation and spatial frequency tuning in macaque V1.

Authors:  Dajun Xing; Dario L Ringach; Robert Shapley; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Local sensitivity to stimulus orientation and spatial frequency within the receptive fields of neurons in visual area 2 of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  X Tao; B Zhang; E L Smith; S Nishimoto; I Ohzawa; Y M Chino
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Dominant vertical orientation processing without clustered maps: early visual brain dynamics imaged with voltage-sensitive dye in the pigeon visual Wulst.

Authors:  Benedict Shien Wei Ng; Agnieszka Grabska-Barwińska; Onur Güntürkün; Dirk Jancke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Preferred locomotor phase of activity of lumbar interneurons during air-stepping in subchronic spinal cats.

Authors:  Nicholas AuYong; Karen Ollivier-Lanvin; Michel A Lemay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Principles of contour information: Reply to Lim and Leek (2012).

Authors:  Manish Singh; Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Spontaneous Fluctuations in Visual Cortical Responses Influence Population Coding Accuracy.

Authors:  Diego A Gutnisky; Charles B Beaman; Sergio E Lew; Valentin Dragoi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Similarity and number of alternatives in the random-dot motion paradigm.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Raoul P P P Grasman; Birte U Forstmann; Max C Keuken; Scott D Brown; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Stimulation of non-classical receptive field enhances orientation selectivity in the cat.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Yang Dan; Chao-Yi Li
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The influence of cortical feature maps on the encoding of the orientation of a short line.

Authors:  K N Shokhirev; T Kumar; D A Glaser
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.