OBJECTIVE: Performance monitoring deficits have been proposed as a cognitive marker involved in the development of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but it is unclear whether these deficits cause impairment when established action sequences conflict with environmental demands. The current study applies a novel data-analytic technique to a well-established sequence learning paradigm to investigate reactions to disruption of learned behavior in ADHD. METHOD: Children (ages 8-12) with and without ADHD completed a serial reaction time task in which they implicitly learned an 8-item sequence of keypresses over 5 training blocks. The training sequence was replaced with a novel sequence in a transfer block, and returned in 2 subsequent recovery blocks. Response time (RT) data were fit by a Bayesian hierarchical version of the linear ballistic accumulator model, which permitted the dissociation of learning processes from performance monitoring effects on RT. RESULTS: Sequence-specific learning on the task was reflected in the systematic reduction of the amount of evidence required to initiate a response, and was unimpaired in ADHD. When the novel sequence onset, typically developing children displayed a shift in their attentional state while children with ADHD did not, leading to worse subsequent performance compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Children with ADHD are not impaired in learning novel action sequences, but display difficulty monitoring their implementation and engaging top-down control when they become inadequate. These results support theories of ADHD that highlight the interactions between monitoring processes and changing cognitive demands as the cause of self-regulation and information-processing problems in the disorder. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Performance monitoring deficits have been proposed as a cognitive marker involved in the development of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but it is unclear whether these deficits cause impairment when established action sequences conflict with environmental demands. The current study applies a novel data-analytic technique to a well-established sequence learning paradigm to investigate reactions to disruption of learned behavior in ADHD. METHOD:Children (ages 8-12) with and without ADHD completed a serial reaction time task in which they implicitly learned an 8-item sequence of keypresses over 5 training blocks. The training sequence was replaced with a novel sequence in a transfer block, and returned in 2 subsequent recovery blocks. Response time (RT) data were fit by a Bayesian hierarchical version of the linear ballistic accumulator model, which permitted the dissociation of learning processes from performance monitoring effects on RT. RESULTS: Sequence-specific learning on the task was reflected in the systematic reduction of the amount of evidence required to initiate a response, and was unimpaired in ADHD. When the novel sequence onset, typically developing children displayed a shift in their attentional state while children with ADHD did not, leading to worse subsequent performance compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS:Children with ADHD are not impaired in learning novel action sequences, but display difficulty monitoring their implementation and engaging top-down control when they become inadequate. These results support theories of ADHD that highlight the interactions between monitoring processes and changing cognitive demands as the cause of self-regulation and information-processing problems in the disorder. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Babette Rae; Andrew Heathcote; Chris Donkin; Lee Averell; Scott Brown Journal: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 3.051
Authors: Tiffany C Ho; Guang Yang; Jing Wu; Pete Cassey; Scott D Brown; Napoleon Hoang; Melanie Chan; Colm G Connolly; Eva Henje-Blom; Larissa G Duncan; Margaret A Chesney; Martin P Paulus; Jeffrey E Max; Ronak Patel; Alan N Simmons; Tony T Yang Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Alexander Weigard; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Andrew Heathcote; Larry Hawk; Nicolas J Schlienz Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 4.530