Literature DB >> 22286223

Missing content from health-related quality of life instruments: interviews with young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Gwendolyn P Quinn1, I-Chan Huang, Devin Murphy, Katie Zidonik-Eddelton, Kevin R Krull.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Young adult survivors of childhood cancer (YASCC) are an ever-growing cohort of survivors due to increasing advances in technology. Today, there is a shift of focus to not just ensuring survivorship but also the quality of survivorship, which can be assessed with standardized instruments. The majority of standardized health related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, however, are non-specific to this age group and the unique late effects within YASCC populations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relevance and accuracy of standardized HRQoL instruments used with YASCC.
METHODS: In a previous study, HRQoL items from several instruments (SF-36, QLACS, QLS-CS) were examined for relevance with a population of YASCC. Participants (n = 30) from this study were recruited for a follow-up qualitative interview to expand on their perceptions of missing content from existing instruments.
RESULTS: Respondents reported missing, relevant content among all three of the HRQoL instruments. Results identified three content areas of missing information: (1) Perceived sense of self, (2) Relationships, and (3) Parenthood.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing HRQoL instruments do not take into account the progression and interdependence of emotional development impacted by a cancer diagnosis. The themes derived from our qualitative interviews may serve as a foundation for the generation of new items in future HRQoL instruments for YASCC populations. Further testing is required to examine the prevalence, frequency, and breadth of these items in a larger sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22286223      PMCID: PMC4291119          DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0120-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  40 in total

1.  Quality of life and current coping in young adult survivors of childhood cancer: positive expectations about the further course of the disease were correlated with better quality of life.

Authors:  H Stam; M A Grootenhuis; H N Caron; B F Last
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

3.  Quality of life among long-term adolescent and adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Maunsell; Lisa Pogany; Maru Barrera; Amanda K Shaw; Kathy N Speechley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Assessing the impact of cancer: development of a new instrument for long-term survivors.

Authors:  Brad J Zebrack; Patricia A Ganz; Coen A Bernaards; Laura Petersen; Laura Abraham
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Health-related quality of life and adverse late effects in adult (very) long-term childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  R Blaauwbroek; A D Stant; K H Groenier; W A Kamps; B Meyboom; A Postma
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  Motivation for parenthood after cancer: a review.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005

Review 7.  Psychosocial dimensions of cancer in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Elana E Evan; Lonnie K Zeltzer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Paternity following treatment for testicular cancer.

Authors:  Marianne Brydøy; Sophie D Fosså; Olbjørn Klepp; Roy M Bremnes; Erik A Wist; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Olav Dahl
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Living with cancer: children with extraordinary courage.

Authors:  M Hockenberry-Eaton; P Minick
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  The use of the SF-36 questionnaire in adult survivors of childhood cancer: evaluation of data quality, score reliability, and scaling assumptions.

Authors:  Raoul C Reulen; Maurice P Zeegers; Crispin Jenkinson; Emma R Lancashire; David L Winter; Meriel E Jenney; Mike M Hawkins
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Minneapolis-Manchester Quality of Life Instrument: reliability and validity of the Adult Form in cancer survivors.

Authors:  Alysia Bosworth; Elizabeth L Goodman; Eric Wu; Liton Francisco; Leslie L Robison; Smita Bhatia
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Patterns of unmet needs in adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: in their own words.

Authors:  Alex W K Wong; Ting-Ting Chang; Katrina Christopher; Stephen C L Lau; Lynda K Beaupin; Brad Love; Kim L Lipsey; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  The Pediatric Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (pTESS): Validation of a Self-reported Functional Outcomes Tool for Children with Extremity Tumors.

Authors:  Janine Piscione; Wendy Barden; Janie Barry; Alexandra Malkin; Trisha Roy; Tyki Sueyoshi; Karen Mazil; Steven Salomon; Firas Dandachli; Anthony Griffin; Hugo Saint-Yves; Pina Giuliano; Abha Gupta; Peter Ferguson; Katrin Scheinemann; Michelle Ghert; Robert E Turcotte; Lucie Lafay-Cousin; Joel Werier; Caron Strahlendorf; Marc Isler; Sophie Mottard; Samina Afzal; Megan E Anderson; Sevan Hopyan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Optimizing the measurement of health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  John M Salsman; Suzanne C Danhauer; Justin B Moore; Mollie R Canzona; David E Victorson; Bradley J Zebrack; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Quality of life in adolescent and young adult cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Vânia Gonçalves; Ivana Sehovic; Meghan L Bowman; Damon R Reed
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2015-02-17

6.  Negative and positive consequences of adolescent cancer 10 years after diagnosis: an interview-based longitudinal study in Sweden.

Authors:  Vicky Lehmann; Helena Grönqvist; Gunn Engvall; Malin Ander; Marrit A Tuinman; Mariët Hagedoorn; Robbert Sanderman; Elisabet Mattsson; Louise von Essen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After Use of a Smartphone App for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Pre-Post Interventional Study.

Authors:  Helle Pappot; Gry Assam Taarnhøj; Abbey Elsbernd; Maiken Hjerming; Signe Hanghøj; Marc Jensen; Kirsten Arntz Boisen
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.773

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.