Quality of life among long-term adolescent and adult survivors of childhood cancer.

PURPOSE: We assessed effects of childhood or adolescent cancer on quality of life among adolescent and adult cancer survivors, a group who are thought to be at particular risk for adverse late effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 1,334 survivors and 1,477 age- and sex-matched, general population controls from across Canada using a mailed questionnaire which included the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and measures of self-esteem, optimism, and life satisfaction. General linear models and logistic regression were used. Survivor-control differences corresponding to an effect size (ES) > or = 0.5 were considered clinically important.
RESULTS: Participants were age 15 years to 37 years. Most survivors (83.8%) were diagnosed > or = 10 years earlier. Fewer survivors (62.1%) than controls (71.1%) reported very good or excellent general health (adjusted odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.7). However, quality of life differences between survivors and controls were small, and for the most part probably not clinically important. Three clinical characteristics-having had CNS or bone cancer, more than one treatment series, and > or = two organs with a dysfunction at treatment end-were independently associated with poorer quality of life in the physical dimensions. Only survivors with > or = two organs with dysfunction (8.7%) reported poorer quality of life in both physical and psychosocial domains, with several clinically important ES. The largest ES for the SF-36 physical summary scores were found in the 8% of survivors with two or three of these characteristics simultaneously, compared with those survivors who had none (-0.79 and -1.13, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Overall, a sizeable majority of adolescent and adult long-term survivors of childhood cancer in Canada appear to have adapted well.