Literature DB >> 28682458

Cox regression with dependent error in covariates.

Yijian Huang1, Ching-Yun Wang2.   

Abstract

Many survival studies have error-contaminated covariates due to the lack of a gold standard of measurement. Furthermore, the error distribution can depend on the true covariates but the structure may be difficult to characterize; heteroscedasticity is a common manifestation. We suggest a novel dependent measurement error model with minimal assumptions on the dependence structure, and propose a new functional modeling method for Cox regression when an instrumental variable is available. This proposal accommodates much more general error contamination than existing approaches including nonparametric correction methods of Huang and Wang (2000, Journal of the American Statistical Association 95, 1209-1219; 2006, Statistica Sinica 16, 861-881). The estimated regression coefficients are consistent and asymptotically normal, and a consistent variance estimate is provided for inference. Simulations demonstrate that the procedure performs well even under substantial error contamination. Illustration with a clinical study is provided.
© 2017, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional modeling; Heteroscedastic error; Instrumental variable; Multiplicative error; Nonparametric correction; Proportional hazards model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28682458      PMCID: PMC5756534          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  Proportional hazards model with covariates subject to measurement error.

Authors:  T Nakamura
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Robust best linear estimation for regression analysis using surrogate and instrumental variables.

Authors:  C Y Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Proportional Hazards Model with Covariate Measurement Error and Instrumental Variables.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Estimating the parameters in the Cox model when covariate variables are measured with error.

Authors:  P Hu; A A Tsiatis; M Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Regression calibration in failure time regression.

Authors:  C Y Wang; L Hsu; Z D Feng; R L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Regression dilution in the proportional hazards model.

Authors:  M D Hughes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  CORRECTED SCORE WITH SIZABLE COVARIATE MEASUREMENT ERROR: PATHOLOGY AND REMEDY.

Authors:  Yijian Huang
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.261

8.  A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Study Team.

Authors:  S M Hammer; D A Katzenstein; M D Hughes; H Gundacker; R T Schooley; R H Haubrich; W K Henry; M M Lederman; J P Phair; M Niu; M S Hirsch; T C Merigan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-10       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.