Literature DB >> 29354018

Joint nonparametric correction estimator for excess relative risk regression in survival analysis with exposure measurement error.

Ching-Yun Wang1, Harry Cullings2, Xiao Song3, Kenneth J Kopecky1.   

Abstract

Observational epidemiological studies often confront the problem of estimating exposure-disease relationships when the exposure is not measured exactly. In the paper, we investigate exposure measurement error in excess relative risk regression, which is a widely used model in radiation exposure effect research. In the study cohort, a surrogate variable is available for the true unobserved exposure variable. The surrogate variable satisfies a generalized version of the classical additive measurement error model, but it may or may not have repeated measurements. In addition, an instrumental variable is available for individuals in a subset of the whole cohort. We develop a nonparametric correction (NPC) estimator using data from the subcohort, and further propose a joint nonparametric correction (JNPC) estimator using all observed data to adjust for exposure measurement error. An optimal linear combination estimator of JNPC and NPC is further developed. The proposed estimators are nonparametric, which are consistent without imposing a covariate or error distribution, and are robust to heteroscedastic errors. Finite sample performance is examined via a simulation study. We apply the developed methods to data from the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, in which chromosome aberration is used to adjust for the effects of radiation dose measurement error on the estimation of radiation dose responses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Excess relative risk; Instrumental variable; Measurement error; Survival analysis

Year:  2017        PMID: 29354018      PMCID: PMC5773020          DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol        ISSN: 1369-7412            Impact factor:   4.488


  10 in total

1.  Robust best linear estimation for regression analysis using surrogate and instrumental variables.

Authors:  C Y Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Allowing for random errors in radiation dose estimates for the atomic bomb survivor data.

Authors:  D A Pierce; D O Stram; M Vaeth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Proportional Hazards Model with Covariate Measurement Error and Instrumental Variables.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  An estimate of the magnitude of random errors in the DS86 dosimetry from data on chromosome aberrations and severe epilation.

Authors:  R Sposto; D O Stram; A A Awa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  The observed relationship between the occurrence of acute radiation effects and leukemia mortality among A-bomb survivors.

Authors:  K Neriishi; D O Stram; M Vaeth; S Mizuno; S Akiba
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Biomarker-calibrated energy and protein consumption and cardiovascular disease risk among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice; Ying Huang; Lewis H Kuller; Lesley F Tinker; Linda Van Horn; Marcia L Stefanick; Gloria Sarto; Judith Ockene; Karen C Johnson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  On the application of linear relative risk regression models.

Authors:  R L Prentice; M W Mason
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Stable chromosome aberrations in atomic bomb survivors: results from 25 years of investigation.

Authors:  Y Kodama; D Pawel; N Nakamura; D Preston; T Honda; M Itoh; M Nakano; K Ohtaki; S Funamoto; A A Awa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Stable chromosome aberrations among A-bomb survivors: an update.

Authors:  D O Stram; R Sposto; D Preston; S Abrahamson; T Honda; A A Awa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Allowance for random dose estimation errors in atomic bomb survivor studies: a revision.

Authors:  Donald A Pierce; Michael Vaeth; John B Cologne
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.841

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Semiparametric regression calibration for general hazard models in survival analysis with covariate measurement error; surprising performance under linear hazard.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Wang; Xiao Song
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.