Literature DB >> 22284431

Direct comparison of measured and calculated total knee replacement force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait patterns.

Hannah J Lundberg1, Kharma C Foucher, Thomas P Andriacchi, Markus A Wimmer.   

Abstract

Knee joint forces measured from instrumented implants provide important information for testing the validity of computational models that predict knee joint forces. The purpose of this study was to validate a parametric numerical model for predicting knee joint contact forces against measurements from four subjects with instrumented TKRs during the stance phase of gait. Model sensitivity to abnormal gait patterns was also investigated. The results demonstrated good agreement for three subjects with relatively normal gait patterns, where the difference between the mean measured and calculated forces ranged from 0.05 to 0.45 body weights, and the envelopes of measured and calculated forces (from three walking trials) overlapped. The fourth subject, who had a "quadriceps avoidance" external moment pattern, initially had little overlap between the measured and calculated force envelopes. When additional constraints were added, tailored to the subject's gait pattern, the model predictions improved to complete force envelope overlap. Coefficient of multiple determination analysis indicated that the shape of the measured and calculated force waveforms were similar for all subjects (adjusted coefficient of multiple correlation values between 0.88 and 0.92). The parametric model was accurate in predicting both the magnitude and waveform of the contact force, and the accuracy of model predictions was affected by deviations from normal gait patterns. Equally important, the envelope of forces generated by the range of solutions substantially overlapped with the corresponding measured envelope from multiple gait trials for a given subject, suggesting that the variable strategic processes of in vivo force generation are covered by the solution range of this parametric model. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22284431      PMCID: PMC3310338          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  28 in total

1.  Muscle activation pattern and gait biomechanics after total knee replacement.

Authors:  M G Benedetti; F Catani; T W Bilotta; M Marcacci; E Mariani; S Giannini
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Muscle, ligament, and joint-contact forces at the knee during walking.

Authors:  Kevin B Shelburne; Michael R Torry; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Correlation between the knee adduction torque and medial contact force for a variety of gait patterns.

Authors:  Dong Zhao; Scott A Banks; Kim H Mitchell; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months.

Authors:  Bernd Heinlein; Ines Kutzner; Friedmar Graichen; Alwina Bender; Antonius Rohlmann; Andreas M Halder; Alexander Beier; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  In vivo knee loading characteristics during activities of daily living as measured by an instrumented total knee replacement.

Authors:  Annegret Mündermann; Chris O Dyrby; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  The Mark Coventry Award: in vivo knee forces during recreation and exercise after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Nikolai Steklov; Shantanu Patil; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Mathematical model of the lower extremity joint reaction forces using Kane's method of dynamics.

Authors:  R D Komistek; J B Stiehl; D A Dennis; R D Paxson; R W Soutas-Little
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Interaction between intrinsic knee mechanics and the knee extensor mechanism.

Authors:  L F Draganich; T P Andriacchi; G B Andersson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking.

Authors:  J B Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Methods for locating the tibio-femoral contact pathway in total knee replacements using marker-based gait analysis and standard radiography.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Andrea Swanson; Christopher Knowlton; Nozomu Inoue; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014
View more
  12 in total

1.  Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?

Authors:  Ryan D Freed; Jacqueline C Simon; Christopher B Knowlton; Diego A Orozco Villaseñor; Markus A Wimmer; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Multibody muscle driven model of an instrumented prosthetic knee during squat and toe rise motions.

Authors:  Antonis P Stylianou; Trent M Guess; Mohammad Kia
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Prediction of kinematic and kinetic performance in a drop vertical jump with individual anthropometric factors in adolescent female athletes: implications for cadaveric investigations.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Bates; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Comparison of ISO standard and TKR patient axial force profiles during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Valentina Ngai; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  Methods for locating the tibio-femoral contact pathway in total knee replacements using marker-based gait analysis and standard radiography.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Andrea Swanson; Christopher Knowlton; Nozomu Inoue; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

6.  Fine tuning total knee replacement contact force prediction algorithms using blinded model validation.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Christopher Knowlton; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Computational Framework for Determining Patient-Specific Total Knee Arthroplasty Loading.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 0.582

Review 8.  Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms.

Authors:  J Gallo; S B Goodman; Y T Konttinen; M A Wimmer; M Holinka
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Gait assessment as a functional outcome measure in total knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jeeshan Rahman; Quen Tang; Maureen Monda; Jonathan Miles; Ian McCarthy
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Knee Joint Loads and Surrounding Muscle Forces during Stair Ascent in Patients with Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Robert Rasnick; Tyler Standifird; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Harold E Cates; Songning Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.