Literature DB >> 9593214

Mathematical model of the lower extremity joint reaction forces using Kane's method of dynamics.

R D Komistek1, J B Stiehl, D A Dennis, R D Paxson, R W Soutas-Little.   

Abstract

This report describes a new mathematical model for defining the joint reaction forces of the lower extremity using Kane's method of dynamics. Our model utilized average lower extremity joint motion and force/plate data from one healthy female patient during gait. From a cadaver specimen, the anatomical mass centers of the pelvis, femur, tibia, and foot were determined. Joint angular motion during the normal gait cycle was computed using Cardan angles for each distal segment relative to the proximal segment. Fluoroscopy of four normal knees determined average femorotibial and patellofemoral contact positions throughout flexion. A three-dimensional model of the lower extremity was defined in weight-bearing motion by 30 differential equations. During normal walking, the joint reaction forces for the subject tested ranged from 1.9 to 2.6 times body weight at the hip joint and 1.7-2.3 times body weight at the knee joint, depending primarily on gait speed. The method correlates well with known in vivo telemetrically measured forces at the hip joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9593214     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00128-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  13 in total

1.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Direct comparison of measured and calculated total knee replacement force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait patterns.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Kharma C Foucher; Thomas P Andriacchi; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Multibody dynamic simulation of knee contact mechanics.

Authors:  Yanhong Bei; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  The 2011 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: 'Lab'-in-a-knee: in vivo knee forces, kinematics, and contact analysis.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Shantanu Patil; Nicolai Steklov; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Knee joint forces: prediction, measurement, and significance.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Benjamin J Fregly; Shantanu Patil; Nikolai Steklov; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.617

6.  A handheld computer as part of a portable in vivo knee joint load monitoring system.

Authors:  Ja Szivek; Vs Nandakumar; Cp Geffre; Cp Townsend
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 0.582

Review 7.  The interface of functional biotribology and regenerative medicine in synovial joints.

Authors:  Corey P Neu; Kyriakos Komvopoulos; A Hari Reddi
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.389

8.  Quantitative Evaluation of the Mechanical Risks Caused by Focal Cartilage Defects in the Knee.

Authors:  Mikko S Venäläinen; Mika E Mononen; Jari Salo; Lasse P Räsänen; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs; Tuomas Virén; Rami K Korhonen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  In vivo evaluation of edge-loading in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients with pseudotumours.

Authors:  Y-M Kwon; S J Mellon; P Monk; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Does simulated walking cause gapping of meniscal repairs?

Authors:  Patrick C McCulloch; Hugh L Jones; Kendall Hamilton; Michael G Hogen; Jonathan E Gold; Philip C Noble
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2016-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.