Literature DB >> 25328466

Methods for locating the tibio-femoral contact pathway in total knee replacements using marker-based gait analysis and standard radiography.

Hannah J Lundberg1, Andrea Swanson2, Christopher Knowlton2, Nozomu Inoue1, Markus A Wimmer1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to develop and test techniques for tracking the path of contact between the tibial and femoral total knee replacement components during level over-ground walking. The tibio-femoral path of contact could be an indicator of the in vivo performance of a total knee replacement as an estimator of areas of contact between the implant components. A longer contact path, indicative of more sliding between the implant components during walking, could indicate an implant at risk for increased wear. In addition, the tibio-femoral contact path determines the position and length of the muscle and ligament lever arms about the knee, and can subsequently influence knee contact force calculations.
METHODS: Two methods were developed to predict the tibio-femoral contact pathways for total knee replacement devices. Both methods used patient-specific knee kinematics obtained during gait analysis, standard radiographs obtained during clinical follow-ups, and point-clouds of the tibial and femoral bearing surfaces. The validity of the techniques was evaluated with knee wear simulator tests and comparisons to wear scars on postmortem retrieved tibial components.
RESULTS: The average total anterior-posterior distance covered by the contact path for ten patients implanted with a total knee replacement was 29.01 mm on the lateral side, and 21.80 mm on the medial side. Both methods for predicting the tibiofemoral contact pathways yielded similar results, and fell within the wear scars of simulator-tested and postmortem retrieved implants.
CONCLUSIONS: The methods for predicting the tibio-femoral contact pathway using marker-based gait analysis and standard clinical radiographs are computationally simple, and reliably predict contact path characteristics as evaluated against wear scars from knee wear simulator tests and postmortem retrieved implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knee contact mechanics; marker-based gait analysis; tibio-femoral contact path; total knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25328466      PMCID: PMC4127717     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  22 in total

1.  Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy.

Authors:  William A. Hoff; Richard D. Komistek; Douglas A. Dennis; Stefan M. Gabriel; Scott A. Walker
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo.

Authors:  David G Lloyd; Thor F Besier
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The impact of femoral component rotational alignment on condylar lift-off.

Authors:  Giles R Scuderi; Richard D Komistek; Douglas A Dennis; John N Insall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Direct comparison of measured and calculated total knee replacement force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait patterns.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Kharma C Foucher; Thomas P Andriacchi; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint.

Authors:  M A R Freeman; V Pinskerova
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique.

Authors:  Taiyo Asano; Masao Akagi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J B Stiehl; R D Komistek; D A Dennis; R D Paxson; W A Hoff
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-11

8.  The axes of rotation of the knee.

Authors:  A M Hollister; S Jatana; A K Singh; W W Sullivan; A G Lupichuk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  2003 Hap Paul Award Paper of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty. Design and activity dependence of kinematics in fixed and mobile-bearing knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Scott A Banks; W Andrew Hodge
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Kinematic evaluation of cruciate-retaining total knee replacement patients during level walking: a comparison with the displacement-controlled ISO standard.

Authors:  Valentina Ngai; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  3 in total

1.  Direct comparison of measured and calculated total knee replacement force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait patterns.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Kharma C Foucher; Thomas P Andriacchi; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Are Instrumented Knee Forces Representative of a Larger Population of Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasties?

Authors:  Ryan D Freed; Jacqueline C Simon; Christopher B Knowlton; Diego A Orozco Villaseñor; Markus A Wimmer; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Comparison of ISO standard and TKR patient axial force profiles during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Valentina Ngai; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.617

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.