Literature DB >> 19285767

ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months.

Bernd Heinlein1, Ines Kutzner, Friedmar Graichen, Alwina Bender, Antonius Rohlmann, Andreas M Halder, Alexander Beier, Georg Bergmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detailed information about the loading of the knee joint is required for various investigations in total knee replacement. Up to now, gait analysis plus analytical musculo-skeletal models were used to calculate the forces and moments acting in the knee joint. Currently, all experimental and numerical pre-clinical tests rely on these indirect measurements which have limitations. The validation of these methods requires in vivo data; therefore, the purpose of this study was to provide in vivo loading data of the knee joint.
METHODS: A custom-made telemetric tibial tray was used to measure the three forces and three moments acting in the implant. This prosthesis was implanted into two subjects and measurements were obtained for a follow-up of 6 and 10 months, respectively. Subjects performed level walking and going up and down stairs using a self-selected comfortable speed. The subjects' activities were captured simultaneously with the load data on a digital video tape. Customized software enabled the display of all information in one video sequence.
FINDINGS: The highest mean values of the peak load components from the two subjects were as follows: during level walking the forces were 276%BW (percent body weight) in axial direction, 21%BW (medio-lateral), and 29%BW (antero-posterior). The moments were 1.8%BW*m in the sagittal plane, 4.3%BW*m (frontal plane) and 1.0%BW*m (transversal plane). During stair climbing the axial force increased to 306%BW, while the shear forces changed only slightly. The sagittal plane moment increased to 2.4%BW*m, while the frontal and transversal plane moments decreased slightly. Stair descending produced the highest forces of 352%BW (axial), 35%BW (medio-lateral), and 36%BW (antero-posterior). The sagittal and frontal plane moments increased to 2.8%BW*m and 4.6%BW*m, respectively, while the transversal plane moment changed only slightly.
INTERPRETATION: Using the data obtained, mechanical simulators can be programmed according to realistic load profiles. Furthermore, musculo-skeletal models can be validated, which until now often lacked the ability to predict properly the non-sagittal load values, e.g. varus-valgus and internal-external moments.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19285767     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  48 in total

1.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Direct comparison of measured and calculated total knee replacement force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait patterns.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Kharma C Foucher; Thomas P Andriacchi; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Concurrent prediction of muscle and tibiofemoral contact forces during treadmill gait.

Authors:  Trent M Guess; Antonis P Stylianou; Mohammad Kia
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  The effect of geometric variations in posterior-stabilized knee designs on motion characteristics measured in a knee loading machine.

Authors:  Peter S Walker; Michael T Lowry; Anoop Kumar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Biomechanical analysis of the tibial tray design in TKA: comparison between modular and offset tibial trays.

Authors:  Ângela Chan; João Gamelas; João Folgado; Paulo R Fernandes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Multibody muscle driven model of an instrumented prosthetic knee during squat and toe rise motions.

Authors:  Antonis P Stylianou; Trent M Guess; Mohammad Kia
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Improved stability with intramedullary stem after anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Completo; F Fonseca; C Relvas; A Ramos; J A Simões
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Authors:  Sally Arno; Christopher P Bell; Michael J Alaia; Brian C Singh; Laith M Jazrawi; Peter S Walker; Ankit Bansal; Garret Garofolo; Orrin H Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vlad Georgeanu; Tudor Atasiei; Lucian Gruionu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-03

Review 10.  Role of Piezo Channels in Joint Health and Injury.

Authors:  W Lee; F Guilak; W Liedtke
Journal:  Curr Top Membr       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.049

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.