OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based and expert-driven quality indicators for measuring variations in the structure and organization of acute inpatient rehabilitation for children after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to survey centers across the United States to determine the degree of variation in care. DESIGN: Quality indicators were developed using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi method. Adherence to these indicators was determined from a survey of rehabilitation facilities. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation units in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of rehabilitation programs identified using data from the National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions, Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, and the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities yielded 74 inpatient units treating children with TBI. Survey respondents comprised 31 pediatric and 28 all age units. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variations in structure and organization of care among institutions providing acute inpatient rehabilitation for children with TBI. RESULTS: Twelve indicators were developed. Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation units and units with higher volumes of children with TBI were more likely to have: a census of at least 1 child admitted with a TBI for at least 90% of the time; adequate specialized equipment; a classroom; a pediatric subspecialty trained medical director; and more than 75% of therapists with pediatric training. CONCLUSIONS: There were clinically and statistically significant variations in the structure and organization of acute pediatric rehabilitation based on the pediatric focus of the unit and volume of children with TBI.
OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based and expert-driven quality indicators for measuring variations in the structure and organization of acute inpatient rehabilitation for children after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to survey centers across the United States to determine the degree of variation in care. DESIGN: Quality indicators were developed using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi method. Adherence to these indicators was determined from a survey of rehabilitation facilities. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation units in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of rehabilitation programs identified using data from the National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions, Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, and the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities yielded 74 inpatient units treating children with TBI. Survey respondents comprised 31 pediatric and 28 all age units. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variations in structure and organization of care among institutions providing acute inpatient rehabilitation for children with TBI. RESULTS: Twelve indicators were developed. Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation units and units with higher volumes of children with TBI were more likely to have: a census of at least 1 child admitted with a TBI for at least 90% of the time; adequate specialized equipment; a classroom; a pediatric subspecialty trained medical director; and more than 75% of therapists with pediatric training. CONCLUSIONS: There were clinically and statistically significant variations in the structure and organization of acute pediatric rehabilitation based on the pediatric focus of the unit and volume of children with TBI.
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard A Orr; Kathryn A Felmet; Yong Han; Karin A McCloskey; Michelle A Dragotta; Debra M Bills; Bradley A Kuch; R Scott Watson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Sean P Clarke; Linda Flynn; Jean Ann Seago; Joanne Spetz; Herbert L Smith Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ellen J Mackenzie; Frederick P Rivara; Gregory J Jurkovich; Avery B Nathens; Brian L Egleston; David S Salkever; Katherine P Frey; Daniel O Scharfstein Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Frederick P Rivara; Stephanie K Ennis; Rita Mangione-Smith; Ellen J MacKenzie; Kenneth M Jaffe Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Frederick P Rivara; Stephanie K Ennis; Rita Mangione-Smith; Ellen J MacKenzie; Kenneth M Jaffe Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Nathalia Jimenez; Marisa Osorio; Jessica L Ramos; Susan Apkon; Beth E Ebel; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Brianna M Mills; Kelsey M Conrick; Scott Anderson; Julian Bailes; Barry P Boden; Darryl Conway; James Ellis; Francis Feld; Murphy Grant; Brian Hainline; Glenn Henry; Stanley A Herring; Wellington K Hsu; Alex Isakov; Tory R Lindley; Lance McNamara; Jason P Mihalik; Timothy L Neal; Margot Putukian; Frederick P Rivara; Allen K Sills; Erik E Swartz; Monica S Vavilala; Ron Courson Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Adrian M Svingos; Stacy J Suskauer; Beth S Slomine; Hsuan Wei Chen; Michael E Ellis-Stockley; Rob J Forsyth Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-10-30 Impact factor: 4.060