BACKGROUND: Although studies have shown that treatment at a trauma center reduces a patient's risk of dying following major trauma, important questions remain as to the effect of trauma centers on functional outcomes, especially among patients who have sustained major lower-limb trauma. METHODS: Domain-specific scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) supplemented by scores on the mobility subscale of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) and the Revised Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-R) were compared among patients treated in eighteen hospitals with a level-I trauma center and fifty-one hospitals without a trauma center. Included in the study were 1389 adults, eighteen to eighty-four years of age, with at least one lower-limb injury with a score of >/=3 points according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). To account for the competing risk of death, we estimated the survivors' average causal effect. Estimates were derived for all patients with a lower-limb injury and separately for a subset of patients without associated injuries of the head or spinal cord. RESULTS: For patients with a lower-limb injury resulting from a high-energy force, care at a trauma center yielded modest but clinically meaningful improvements in physical functioning and overall vitality at one year after the injury. After adjustment for differences in case mix and the competing risk of death, the average differences in the SF-36 physical functioning and vitality scores and the MFA mobility score were 7.82 points (95% confidence interval: 2.65, 12.98), 6.80 points (95% confidence interval: 2.53, 11.07), and 6.31 points (95% confidence interval: 0.25, 12.36), respectively. These results were similar when the analysis was restricted to patients without associated injuries to the head or spine. Treatment at a trauma center resulted in negligible differences in outcome for the subset of patients with injuries resulting from low-energy forces. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that patients who sustain high-energy lower-limb trauma benefit from treatment at a level-I trauma center.
BACKGROUND: Although studies have shown that treatment at a trauma center reduces a patient's risk of dying following major trauma, important questions remain as to the effect of trauma centers on functional outcomes, especially among patients who have sustained major lower-limb trauma. METHODS: Domain-specific scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) supplemented by scores on the mobility subscale of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) and the Revised Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-R) were compared among patients treated in eighteen hospitals with a level-I trauma center and fifty-one hospitals without a trauma center. Included in the study were 1389 adults, eighteen to eighty-four years of age, with at least one lower-limb injury with a score of >/=3 points according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). To account for the competing risk of death, we estimated the survivors' average causal effect. Estimates were derived for all patients with a lower-limb injury and separately for a subset of patients without associated injuries of the head or spinal cord. RESULTS: For patients with a lower-limb injury resulting from a high-energy force, care at a trauma center yielded modest but clinically meaningful improvements in physical functioning and overall vitality at one year after the injury. After adjustment for differences in case mix and the competing risk of death, the average differences in the SF-36 physical functioning and vitality scores and the MFA mobility score were 7.82 points (95% confidence interval: 2.65, 12.98), 6.80 points (95% confidence interval: 2.53, 11.07), and 6.31 points (95% confidence interval: 0.25, 12.36), respectively. These results were similar when the analysis was restricted to patients without associated injuries to the head or spine. Treatment at a trauma center resulted in negligible differences in outcome for the subset of patients with injuries resulting from low-energy forces. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that patients who sustain high-energy lower-limb trauma benefit from treatment at a level-I trauma center.
Authors: Jennifer M Zumsteg; Stephanie K Ennis; Kenneth M Jaffe; Rita Mangione-Smith; Ellen J MacKenzie; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Lisa M Gargano; Ho Ki Mok; Melanie H Jacobson; Patricia Frazier; Sascha K Garrey; Lysa J Petrsoric; Robert M Brackbill Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Antonia F Chen; Verena M Schreiber; Wesley Washington; Nalini Rao; Andrew R Evans Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Nazri Mohd Yusof; Kamarul Ariffin Khalid; Ahmad Hafiz Zulkifly; Zamzuri Zakaria; Mohammad Azril Mohammad Amin; Muhammad Shukimi Awang; Aminudin Che Ahmad; Sheikh Farid Uddin Akter Journal: Malays J Med Sci Date: 2013-10
Authors: Deepika Mohan; Amber E Barnato; Matthew R Rosengart; Derek C Angus; Kenneth J Smith Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 2.229