Literature DB >> 22278923

The roles of FGF and MAP kinase signaling in the segregation of the epiblast and hypoblast cell lineages in bovine and human embryos.

Ewart W Kuijk1, Leni T A van Tol, Hilde Van de Velde, Richard Wubbolts, Maaike Welling, Niels Geijsen, Bernard A J Roelen.   

Abstract

At the blastocyst stage of mammalian pre-implantation development, three distinct cell lineages have formed: trophectoderm, hypoblast (primitive endoderm) and epiblast. The inability to derive embryonic stem (ES) cell lines in a variety of species suggests divergence between species in the cell signaling pathways involved in early lineage specification. In mouse, segregation of the primitive endoderm lineage from the pluripotent epiblast lineage depends on FGF/MAP kinase signaling, but it is unknown whether this is conserved between species. Here we examined segregation of the hypoblast and epiblast lineages in bovine and human embryos through modulation of FGF/MAP kinase signaling pathways in cultured embryos. Bovine embryos stimulated with FGF4 and heparin form inner cell masses (ICMs) composed entirely of hypoblast cells and no epiblast cells. Inhibition of MEK in bovine embryos results in ICMs with increased epiblast precursors and decreased hypoblast precursors. The hypoblast precursor population was not fully ablated upon MEK inhibition, indicating that other factors are involved in hypoblast differentiation. Surprisingly, inhibition of FGF signaling upstream of MEK had no effects on epiblast and hypoblast precursor numbers in bovine development, suggesting that GATA6 expression is not dependent on FGF signaling. By contrast, in human embryos, inhibition of MEK did not significantly alter epiblast or hypoblast precursor numbers despite the ability of the MEK inhibitor to potently inhibit ERK phosphorylation in human ES cells. These findings demonstrate intrinsic differences in early mammalian development in the role of the FGF/MAP kinase signaling pathways in governing hypoblast versus epiblast lineage choices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22278923      PMCID: PMC3274353          DOI: 10.1242/dev.071688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  48 in total

1.  Differences in early lineage segregation between mammals.

Authors:  Ewart W Kuijk; Leonie Du Puy; Helena T A Van Tol; Christine H Y Oei; Henk P Haagsman; Ben Colenbrander; Bernard A J Roelen
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.780

2.  Generation of rat and human induced pluripotent stem cells by combining genetic reprogramming and chemical inhibitors.

Authors:  Wenlin Li; Wei Wei; Saiyong Zhu; Jinliang Zhu; Yan Shi; Tongxiang Lin; Ergeng Hao; Alberto Hayek; Hongkui Deng; Sheng Ding
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 24.633

3.  Markers that define stemness in ESC are unable to identify the totipotent cells in human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  G Cauffman; M De Rycke; K Sermon; I Liebaers; H Van de Velde
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  The Grb2/Mek pathway represses Nanog in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Takashi Hamazaki; Sarah M Kehoe; Toru Nakano; Naohiro Terada
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Validated germline-competent embryonic stem cell lines from nonobese diabetic mice.

Authors:  Jennifer Nichols; Kenneth Jones; Jenny M Phillips; Stephen A Newland; Mila Roode; William Mansfield; Austin Smith; Anne Cooke
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Germline competent embryonic stem cells derived from rat blastocysts.

Authors:  Ping Li; Chang Tong; Ruty Mehrian-Shai; Li Jia; Nancy Wu; Youzhen Yan; Robert E Maxson; Eric N Schulze; Houyan Song; Chih-Lin Hsieh; Martin F Pera; Qi-Long Ying
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Capture of authentic embryonic stem cells from rat blastocysts.

Authors:  Mia Buehr; Stephen Meek; Kate Blair; Jian Yang; Janice Ure; Jose Silva; Renee McLay; John Hall; Qi-Long Ying; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo.

Authors:  Jens-Erik Dietrich; Takashi Hiiragi
Journal:  Development       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Berenika Plusa; Anna Piliszek; Stephen Frankenberg; Jérôme Artus; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  Qi-Long Ying; Jason Wray; Jennifer Nichols; Laura Batlle-Morera; Bradley Doble; James Woodgett; Philip Cohen; Austin Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  80 in total

Review 1.  Delineating nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Jolene Ooi; Pentao Liu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 14.870

Review 2.  BOARD INVITED REVIEW: Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle.

Authors:  Alan D Ealy; Lydia K Wooldridge; Sarah R McCoski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Regulation of present and future development by maternal regulatory signals acting on the embryo during the morula to blastocyst transition - insights from the cow.

Authors:  Peter J Hansen; Paula Tríbulo
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  The WNT signaling antagonist Dickkopf-1 directs lineage commitment and promotes survival of the preimplantation embryo.

Authors:  Anna C Denicol; Jeremy Block; Dale E Kelley; Ky G Pohler; Kyle B Dobbs; Christopher J Mortensen; M Sofia Ortega; Peter J Hansen
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Primitive endoderm differentiation: from specification to epithelium formation.

Authors:  Stéphanie Hermitte; Claire Chazaud
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The transcriptional regulation of pluripotency.

Authors:  Jia-Chi Yeo; Huck-Hui Ng
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 25.617

7.  Technical note: improving the efficiency of generating bovine extraembryonic endoderm cells.

Authors:  Mary K Smith; Catherine C Clark; Sarah R McCoski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Birth defects associated with perturbations in preimplantation, gastrulation, and axis extension: from conjoined twinning to caudal dysgenesis.

Authors:  Anna Ferrer-Vaquer; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 5.814

Review 9.  A close look at the mammalian blastocyst: epiblast and primitive endoderm formation.

Authors:  Jérôme Artus; Claire Chazaud
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 10.  Epigenetics of reprogramming to induced pluripotency.

Authors:  Bernadett Papp; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.