Literature DB >> 30968113

BOARD INVITED REVIEW: Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle.

Alan D Ealy1, Lydia K Wooldridge1, Sarah R McCoski1.   

Abstract

In vitro embryo production (IVP) in cattle has gained worldwide interest in recent years, but the efficiency of using IVP embryos for calf production is far from optimal. This review will examine the pregnancy retention rates of IVP embryos and explore causes for pregnancy failures. Based on work completed over the past 25 yr, only 27% of cattle receiving IVP embryos will produce a live calf. Approximately 60% of these pregnancies fail during the first 6 wk of gestation. When compared with embryos generated by superovulation, pregnancy rates are 10% to 40% lower for cattle carrying IVP embryos, exemplifying that IVP embryos are consistently less competent than in vivo-generated embryos. Several abnormalities have been observed in the morphology of IVP conceptuses. After transfer, IVP embryos are less likely to undergo conceptus elongation, have reduced embryonic disk diameter, and have compromised yolk sac development. Marginal binucleate cell development, cotyledon development, and placental vascularization have also been documented, and these abnormalities are associated with altered fetal growth trajectories. Additionally, in vitro culture conditions increase the risk of large offspring syndrome. Further work is needed to decipher how the embryo culture environment alters post-transfer embryo development and survival. The risk of these neonatal disorders has been reduced by the use of serum-free synthetic oviductal fluid media formations and culture in low oxygen tension. However, alterations are still evident in IVP oocyte and embryo transcript abundances, timing of embryonic cleavage events and blastulation, incidence of aneuploidy, and embryonic methylation status. The inclusion of oviductal and uterine-derived embryokines in culture media is being examined as one way to improve the competency of IVP embryos. To conclude, the evidence presented herein clearly shows that bovine IVP systems still must be refined to make it an economical technology in cattle production systems. However, the current shortcomings do not negate its current value for certain embryo production needs and for investigating early embryonic development in cattle.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cattle; conceptus; embryo; in vitro production; pregnancy failure

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30968113      PMCID: PMC6541818          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  120 in total

1.  Estimates of pregnancy outcomes based on selection of bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro.

Authors:  P W Farin; B D Slenning; J H Britt
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Responses of oocytes and embryos to the culture environment.

Authors:  R L Krisher; B D Bavister
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Effects of different reproduction techniques: AI MOET or IVP, on health and welfare of bovine offspring.

Authors:  A M van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw; E Mullaart; A P de Roos; J S Merton; J H den Daas; B Kemp; L de Ruigh
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Statistical models predicting embryo survival to term in cattle after embryo transfer.

Authors:  W H McMillan
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Transfer of fresh and cryopreserved IVP bovine embryos: normal calving, birth weight and gestation lengths.

Authors:  Y Agca; R L Monson; D L Northey; O A Mazni; D M Schaefer; J J Rutledge
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Abnormal offspring following in vitro production of bovine preimplantation embryos: a field study.

Authors:  A M van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw; B J Aerts; J H den Daas
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Influence of in vitro systems on embryo survival and fetal development in cattle.

Authors:  P W Farin; A E Crosier; C E Farin
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Production efficiency of Japanese black calves by transfer of bovine embryos produced in vitro.

Authors:  T Numabe; T Oikawa; T Kikuchi; T Horiuchi
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  A high proportion of bovine blastocysts produced in vitro are mixoploid.

Authors:  D Viuff; L Rickords; H Offenberg; P Hyttel; B Avery; T Greve; I Olsaker; J L Williams; H Callesen; P D Thomsen
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 10.  Bovine embryo culture in vitro: new developments and post-transfer consequences.

Authors:  J G Thompson; A J Peterson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pregnancy Losses in Livestock: An Overview of the Physiology and Endocrinology Symposium for the 2020 ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS Virtual Meeting.

Authors:  Alan D Ealy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Sin3a regulates the developmental progression through morula-to-blastocyst transition via Hdac1.

Authors:  Panpan Zhao; Shuang Li; Huanan Wang; Yanna Dang; Lefeng Wang; Tong Liu; Shaohua Wang; Xinhong Li; Kun Zhang
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Actions of putative embryokines on development of the preimplantation bovine embryo to the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Lei Sang; W Ortiz; Y Xiao; E Estrada-Cortes; E A Jannaman; P J Hansen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 4.  Bioactive supplements influencing bovine in vitro embryo development.

Authors:  Lydia K Wooldridge; Jessica A Keane; Michelle L Rhoads; Alan D Ealy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 5.  Ruminant conceptus-maternal interactions: interferon-tau and beyond.

Authors:  Daniel J Mathew; Katie D Peterson; L Kirsten Senn; Mary A Oliver; Alan D Ealy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

6.  Zinc supplementation during in vitro embryo culture increases inner cell mass and total cell numbers in bovine blastocysts1.

Authors:  Lydia K Wooldridge; Madison E Nardi; Alan D Ealy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Application of multi-omics data integration and machine learning approaches to identify epigenetic and transcriptomic differences between in vitro and in vivo produced bovine embryos.

Authors:  Maria B Rabaglino; Alan O'Doherty; Jan Bojsen-Møller Secher; Patrick Lonergan; Poul Hyttel; Trudee Fair; Haja N Kadarmideen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The global gene expression outline of the bovine blastocyst: reflector of environmental conditions and predictor of developmental capacity.

Authors:  Dessie Salilew-Wondim; Dawit Tesfaye; Franca Rings; Eva Held-Hoelker; Dennis Miskel; Marc-Andre Sirard; Ernst Tholen; Karl Schellander; Michael Hoelker
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Roles of cell differentiation factors in preimplantation development of domestic animals.

Authors:  Ken Sawai
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Culture Medium and Sex Drive Epigenetic Reprogramming in Preimplantation Bovine Embryos.

Authors:  Sebastian Canovas; Elena Ivanova; Meriem Hamdi; Fernando Perez-Sanz; Dimitrios Rizos; Gavin Kelsey; Pilar Coy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.