PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a gas-cooled, high-powered microwave system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators performed 54 ablations in ex vivo bovine livers using three devices-a single 17-gauge cooled radiofrequency(RF) electrode; a cluster RF electrode; and a single 17-gauge, gas-cooled microwave (MW) antenna-at three time points (n = 6 at 4 minutes, 12 minutes, and 16 minutes). RF power was applied using impedance-based pulsing with maximum 200 W generator output. MW power of 135 W at 2.45 GHz was delivered continuously. An approved in vivo study was performed using 13 domestic pigs. Hepatic ablations were performed using single applicators and the above-mentioned MW and RF generator systems at treatment times of 2 minutes (n = 7 MW, n = 6 RF), 5 minutes (n = 23 MW, n = 8 RF), 7 minutes (n = 11 MW, n = 6 RF), and 10 minutes (n = 7 MW, n = 9 RF). Mean transverse diameter and length of the ablation zones were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc t tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: Single ex vivo MW ablations were larger than single RF ablations at all time points (MW mean diameter range 3.5-4.8 cm 4-16 minutes; RF mean diameter range 2.6-3.1 cm 4-16 minutes) (P < .05). There was no difference in mean diameter between cluster RF and MW ablations (RF 3.3-4.4 cm 4-16 minutes; P = .4-.9). In vivo lesion diameters for MW (and RF) were as follows: 2.6 cm ± 0.72 (RF 1.5 cm ± 0.14), 3.6 cm ± 0.89 (RF 2.0 cm ± 0.4), 3.4 cm ± 0.87 (RF 1.8 cm ± 0.23), and 3.8 cm ± 0.74 (RF 2.1 cm ± 0.3) at 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 7 minutes, and 10 minutes (P < .05 all time points). CONCLUSIONS: Gas-cooled, high-powered MW ablation allows the generation of large ablation zones in short times. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a gas-cooled, high-powered microwave system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators performed 54 ablations in ex vivo bovine livers using three devices-a single 17-gauge cooled radiofrequency(RF) electrode; a cluster RF electrode; and a single 17-gauge, gas-cooled microwave (MW) antenna-at three time points (n = 6 at 4 minutes, 12 minutes, and 16 minutes). RF power was applied using impedance-based pulsing with maximum 200 W generator output. MW power of 135 W at 2.45 GHz was delivered continuously. An approved in vivo study was performed using 13 domestic pigs. Hepatic ablations were performed using single applicators and the above-mentioned MW and RF generator systems at treatment times of 2 minutes (n = 7 MW, n = 6 RF), 5 minutes (n = 23 MW, n = 8 RF), 7 minutes (n = 11 MW, n = 6 RF), and 10 minutes (n = 7 MW, n = 9 RF). Mean transverse diameter and length of the ablation zones were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc t tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: Single ex vivo MW ablations were larger than single RF ablations at all time points (MW mean diameter range 3.5-4.8 cm 4-16 minutes; RF mean diameter range 2.6-3.1 cm 4-16 minutes) (P < .05). There was no difference in mean diameter between cluster RF and MW ablations (RF 3.3-4.4 cm 4-16 minutes; P = .4-.9). In vivo lesion diameters for MW (and RF) were as follows: 2.6 cm ± 0.72 (RF 1.5 cm ± 0.14), 3.6 cm ± 0.89 (RF 2.0 cm ± 0.4), 3.4 cm ± 0.87 (RF 1.8 cm ± 0.23), and 3.8 cm ± 0.74 (RF 2.1 cm ± 0.3) at 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 7 minutes, and 10 minutes (P < .05 all time points). CONCLUSIONS: Gas-cooled, high-powered MW ablation allows the generation of large ablation zones in short times. Copyright Â
Authors: Christopher L Brace; Paul F Laeseke; Daniel W van der Weide; Fred T Lee Journal: IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Farrah J Wolf; David J Grand; Jason T Machan; Thomas A Dipetrillo; William W Mayo-Smith; Damian E Dupuy Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Meghan G Lubner; Tim J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Fred T Lee; Lisa A Sampson; Christopher L Brace Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Rüdiger Hoffmann; Hansjörg Rempp; Frank Eibofner; David-Emanuel Keßler; Gunnar Blumenstock; Jakob Weiß; Philippe L Pereira; Konstantin Nikolaou; Stephan Clasen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Anna J Moreland; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sara L Best; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Marci L Alexander; Christopher L Brace; Douglas R Kitchin; Sean P Hedican; Stephen Y Nakada; Fred T Lee; E Jason Abel Journal: J Endourol Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Timothy J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Emily A Knott; Bridgett J Willey; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.464