Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare intra-procedural radiofrequency (RF) and microwave ablation appearance on non-contrast CT (NCCT) and ultrasound to the zone of pathologic necrosis.Materials and methods: Twenty-one 5-min ablations were performed in vivo in swine liver with (1) microwave at 140 W, (2) microwave at 70 W, or (3) RF at 200 W (n = 7 each). CT and US images were obtained simultaneously at 1, 3, and 5 min during ablation and 2, 5, and 10 min post-ablation. Each ablation was sectioned in the plane of the ultrasound image and underwent vital staining to delineate cellular necrosis. CT was reformatted to the same plane as the ultrasound transducer and transverse diameters of gas and hypoechoic/hypoattenuating zones at each time point were measured. CT, ultrasound and gross pathologic diameter measurements were compared using Student's t-tests and linear regression. Results: Visible gas and the hypoechoic zone on US images were more predictive of the pathologic ablation zone than on NCCT images (p < 0.05). The zone of necrosis was larger than the zone of visible gas on US (mean 3.2 mm for microwave, 6.4 mm for RF) and NCCT (7.6 mm microwave, 13.9 mm RF) images (p < 0.05). The zone of visible gas and hypoechoic zone on US are more predictive of pathology with microwave ablations when compared with RF ablations (p < 0.05). Conclusion: When evaluating images during energy delivery, US is more accurate than CT and microwave- more predictable than RF-ablation based on correlation with in-plane pathology.
Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare intra-procedural radiofrequency (RF) and microwave ablation appearance on non-contrast CT (NCCT) and ultrasound to the zone of pathologic necrosis.Materials and methods: Twenty-one 5-min ablations were performed in vivo in swine liver with (1) microwave at 140 W, (2) microwave at 70 W, or (3) RF at 200 W (n = 7 each). CT and US images were obtained simultaneously at 1, 3, and 5 min during ablation and 2, 5, and 10 min post-ablation. Each ablation was sectioned in the plane of the ultrasound image and underwent vital staining to delineate cellular necrosis. CT was reformatted to the same plane as the ultrasound transducer and transverse diameters of gas and hypoechoic/hypoattenuating zones at each time point were measured. CT, ultrasound and gross pathologic diameter measurements were compared using Student's t-tests and linear regression. Results: Visible gas and the hypoechoic zone on US images were more predictive of the pathologic ablation zone than on NCCT images (p < 0.05). The zone of necrosis was larger than the zone of visible gas on US (mean 3.2 mm for microwave, 6.4 mm for RF) and NCCT (7.6 mm microwave, 13.9 mm RF) images (p < 0.05). The zone of visible gas and hypoechoic zone on US are more predictive of pathology with microwave ablations when compared with RF ablations (p < 0.05). Conclusion: When evaluating images during energy delivery, US is more accurate than CT and microwave- more predictable than RF-ablation based on correlation with in-plane pathology.
Authors: Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Anita Andreano; Lisa Sampson; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Steven Campbell; Robert G Uzzo; Mohamad E Allaf; Eric B Bass; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Anthony Chang; Peter E Clark; Brian J Davis; Ithaar H Derweesh; Leo Giambarresi; Debra A Gervais; Susie L Hu; Brian R Lane; Bradley C Leibovich; Philip M Pierorazio Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Shane A Wells; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee Journal: Radiol Clin North Am Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: E Tanis; J W Spliethoff; D J Evers; G C Langhout; P Snaebjornsson; W Prevoo; B H W Hendriks; T J M Ruers Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Alice Gillams; Nahum Goldberg; Muneeb Ahmed; Reto Bale; David Breen; Matthew Callstrom; Min Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baere; Damian Dupuy; Afshin Gangi; Debra Gervais; Thomas Helmberger; Ernst-Michael Jung; Fred Lee; Riccardo Lencioni; Ping Liang; Tito Livraghi; David Lu; Franca Meloni; Philippe Pereira; Fabio Piscaglia; Hyunchul Rhim; Riad Salem; Constantinos Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas Vogl; Brad Wood; Luigi Solbiati Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Emily A Knott; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sam J Lubner; John F Swietlik; Sharon M Weber; Annie M Zlevor; Colin Longhurst; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Daniel L Mulkerin; Daniel E Abbott; Dustin Deming; Noelle K LoConte; Nataliya Uboha; Allison B Couillard; Shane A Wells; Paul F Laeseke; Marci L Alexander; Fred T Lee Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2021-08