Literature DB >> 32620055

Radiofrequency and microwave ablation in a porcine liver model: non-contrast CT and ultrasound radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Timothy J Ziemlewicz1, J Louis Hinshaw1, Meghan G Lubner1, Emily A Knott1, Bridgett J Willey1, Fred T Lee1, Christopher L Brace1,2,3.   

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare intra-procedural radiofrequency (RF) and microwave ablation appearance on non-contrast CT (NCCT) and ultrasound to the zone of pathologic necrosis.Materials and methods: Twenty-one 5-min ablations were performed in vivo in swine liver with (1) microwave at 140 W, (2) microwave at 70 W, or (3) RF at 200 W (n = 7 each). CT and US images were obtained simultaneously at 1, 3, and 5 min during ablation and 2, 5, and 10 min post-ablation. Each ablation was sectioned in the plane of the ultrasound image and underwent vital staining to delineate cellular necrosis. CT was reformatted to the same plane as the ultrasound transducer and transverse diameters of gas and hypoechoic/hypoattenuating zones at each time point were measured. CT, ultrasound and gross pathologic diameter measurements were compared using Student's t-tests and linear regression.
Results: Visible gas and the hypoechoic zone on US images were more predictive of the pathologic ablation zone than on NCCT images (p < 0.05). The zone of necrosis was larger than the zone of visible gas on US (mean 3.2 mm for microwave, 6.4 mm for RF) and NCCT (7.6 mm microwave, 13.9 mm RF) images (p < 0.05). The zone of visible gas and hypoechoic zone on US are more predictive of pathology with microwave ablations when compared with RF ablations (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: When evaluating images during energy delivery, US is more accurate than CT and microwave- more predictable than RF-ablation based on correlation with in-plane pathology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thermal ablation; hepatic ablation; microwave; radiofrequency; radiologic pathologic correlation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32620055      PMCID: PMC8204285          DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1784471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  31 in total

1.  EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  High-powered microwave ablation with a small-gauge, gas-cooled antenna: initial ex vivo and in vivo results.

Authors:  Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Anita Andreano; Lisa Sampson; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Optical flow and image segmentation analysis for noninvasive precise mapping of microwave thermal ablation in X-ray CT scans - ex vivo study.

Authors:  Omri Ziv; S Nahum Goldberg; Yitzhak Nissenbaum; Jacob Sosna; Noam Weiss; Haim Azhari
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.914

5.  Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline.

Authors:  Steven Campbell; Robert G Uzzo; Mohamad E Allaf; Eric B Bass; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Anthony Chang; Peter E Clark; Brian J Davis; Ithaar H Derweesh; Leo Giambarresi; Debra A Gervais; Susie L Hu; Brian R Lane; Bradley C Leibovich; Philip M Pierorazio
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Microwave tumor ablation: mechanism of action, clinical results, and devices.

Authors:  Meghan G Lubner; Christopher L Brace; J Louis Hinshaw; Fred T Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Creation of radiofrequency lesions in a porcine model: correlation with sonography, CT, and histopathology.

Authors:  S S Raman; D S Lu; D J Vodopich; J Sayre; C Lassman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Liver Ablation: Best Practice.

Authors:  Shane A Wells; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Real-time in vivo assessment of radiofrequency ablation of human colorectal liver metastases using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.

Authors:  E Tanis; J W Spliethoff; D J Evers; G C Langhout; P Snaebjornsson; W Prevoo; B H W Hendriks; T J M Ruers
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a position paper by an international panel of ablation experts, The Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières meeting 2013.

Authors:  Alice Gillams; Nahum Goldberg; Muneeb Ahmed; Reto Bale; David Breen; Matthew Callstrom; Min Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baere; Damian Dupuy; Afshin Gangi; Debra Gervais; Thomas Helmberger; Ernst-Michael Jung; Fred Lee; Riccardo Lencioni; Ping Liang; Tito Livraghi; David Lu; Franca Meloni; Philippe Pereira; Fabio Piscaglia; Hyunchul Rhim; Riad Salem; Constantinos Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas Vogl; Brad Wood; Luigi Solbiati
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  Microwave ablation for colorectal cancer metastasis to the liver: a single-center retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Emily A Knott; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sam J Lubner; John F Swietlik; Sharon M Weber; Annie M Zlevor; Colin Longhurst; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Daniel L Mulkerin; Daniel E Abbott; Dustin Deming; Noelle K LoConte; Nataliya Uboha; Allison B Couillard; Shane A Wells; Paul F Laeseke; Marci L Alexander; Fred T Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.